Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?Does having late or heavy dinner make you fat?Is peanut...

Let's Encrypt and EV certificates for different hosts in the same domain

How much mayhem could I cause as a sentient fish?

Does dispel magic end a master's control over their undead?

Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing

With regard to distributive law of inner product in vector algebra

What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?

Am I a Rude Number?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

How do you voice extended chords?

Is there a lava-breathing lizard creature (that could be worshipped by a cult) in 5e?

False written accusations not made public - is there law to cover this?

A curious equality of integrals involving the prime counting function?

Why don't key signatures indicate the tonic?

Eww, those bytes are gross

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

Alien invasion to probe us, why?

When can a QA tester start his job?

How do you catch Smeargle in Pokemon Go?

Why is Agricola named as such?

Clues on how to solve these types of problems within 2-3 minutes for competitive exams

What to look for when criticizing poetry?

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?

How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?



Does Skippy chunky peanut butter contain trans fat?


Does having late or heavy dinner make you fat?Is peanut butter good for removing gum?Does organic butter have more Omega-3 fat than conventional butter?Does eating trans fatty acids affect immune response?Does Forskolin help to break down fat?Does bread contain traces of alcohol?Does the average American Thanksgiving meal contain 4,500 Calories?Does ghee help burn body fat?Does butter increase nutrient uptake of other foods, especially compared to using margarine?Does Condensed Milk Contain Milk?













24















According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.



However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.



Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with plaque – which can be a cause of heart attacks.



Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5





    Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

    – npst
    yesterday






  • 1





    I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

    – Chloe
    22 hours ago








  • 1





    @Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

    – Chris Redford
    21 hours ago













  • Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

    – iamnotmaynard
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

    – nigel222
    3 hours ago
















24















According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.



However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.



Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with plaque – which can be a cause of heart attacks.



Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 5





    Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

    – npst
    yesterday






  • 1





    I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

    – Chloe
    22 hours ago








  • 1





    @Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

    – Chris Redford
    21 hours ago













  • Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

    – iamnotmaynard
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

    – nigel222
    3 hours ago














24












24








24


2






According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.



However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.



Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with plaque – which can be a cause of heart attacks.



Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.



However, the current label for their chunky peanut butter contains the following ingredient in the listing: Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil (Cottonseed, Soybean and Rapeseed Oil) To Prevent Separation.



Soybean oil is a known source of trans fat, which can be a source of atherosclerosis – the clogging of arteries with plaque – which can be a cause of heart attacks.



Is their website just blatantly lying about the lack of trans fat?







nutrition






share|improve this question









New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 21 hours ago









George Grainger

1505




1505






New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Chris RedfordChris Redford

22628




22628




New contributor




Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Chris Redford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 5





    Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

    – npst
    yesterday






  • 1





    I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

    – Chloe
    22 hours ago








  • 1





    @Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

    – Chris Redford
    21 hours ago













  • Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

    – iamnotmaynard
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

    – nigel222
    3 hours ago














  • 5





    Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

    – npst
    yesterday






  • 1





    I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

    – Chloe
    22 hours ago








  • 1





    @Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

    – Chris Redford
    21 hours ago













  • Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

    – iamnotmaynard
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

    – nigel222
    3 hours ago








5




5





Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

– npst
yesterday





Could it be that local law allows "...has zero grams per serving." meaning "...has less than one gram per serving."?

– npst
yesterday




1




1





I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

– Chloe
22 hours ago







I thought hydrogenated oils was trans-fat, not just soybean oil. So hydrogenated canola (rapeseed) oil would also be trans-fat, right?

– Chloe
22 hours ago






1




1





@Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

– Chris Redford
21 hours ago







@Chloe Only partially hydrogenated oil contains trans fat and the only partially hydrogenated oil is the soy bean oil. The other oils are fully hydrogenated, so they do not contain trans fat.

– Chris Redford
21 hours ago















Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

– iamnotmaynard
9 hours ago





Are you sure the soybean oil is partially hydrogenated? Where does it say that?

– iamnotmaynard
9 hours ago




1




1





Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

– nigel222
3 hours ago





Trans fats are not entirely unnatural. They can develop at low levels during mechanical processing and product storage from the original form. So without legal permission to use 0 to represent "negligible" or "trace", it can't ever be strictly true. Such levels are not a health hazard -- "The poison is in the dose". Of course, the levels in chemically partially hydrogenated fats are completely off the scale of natural occurrence, and do represent a health hazard.

– nigel222
3 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















55















According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.




Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,




The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.




So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,




The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.







share|improve this answer



















  • 22





    This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 56





    @JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

    – jkej
    yesterday






  • 24





    @JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday








  • 20





    @jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 8





    And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday





















10














I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.



Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.



A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.



http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.



https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    "It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

    – jkej
    yesterday








  • 2





    So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

    – Timbo
    yesterday






  • 2





    Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday





















-4














The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:



https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm



If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

    – Flydog57
    yesterday






  • 2





    Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 1





    Doesn't answer the question

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday



















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









55















According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.




Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,




The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.




So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,




The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.







share|improve this answer



















  • 22





    This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 56





    @JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

    – jkej
    yesterday






  • 24





    @JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday








  • 20





    @jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 8





    And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday


















55















According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.




Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,




The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.




So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,




The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.







share|improve this answer



















  • 22





    This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 56





    @JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

    – jkej
    yesterday






  • 24





    @JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday








  • 20





    @jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 8





    And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday
















55












55








55








According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.




Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,




The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.




So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,




The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.







share|improve this answer














According to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter does not contain trans fat.




Strictly speaking, according to their website, Skippy brand peanut butter contains a negligible amount of trans fat. Per the US FDA,




The Nutrition Facts Label can state 0 g of trans fat if the food product contains less than 0.5 g of trans fat per serving. Thus, if a product contains partially hydrogenated oils, then it might contain small amounts of trans fat even if the label says 0 g of trans fat.




So they're being sneaky, right? Not really. The amount of trans fat in a serving of peanut butter is far less than the limit of 0.5 grams that needs to be reported as above zero. Only a tiny amount of hydrogenated vegetable oil is added to peanut butter to make it smooth, prevent separation, and drastically increase shelf life, and only a small amount of that small amount is in the form of trans fat. While non-zero, the amount is essentially undetectable. From Sanders, T.H., 2001. Non-detectable levels of trans-fatty acids in peanut butter. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 49(5), pp.2349-2351,




The fatty acid composition of 11 brands of peanut butter and paste freshly prepared from roasted peanuts was analyzed with emphasis on isomeric trans-fatty acids. No trans-fatty acids were detected in any of the samples in an analytical system with a detection threshold of 0.01% of the sample weight. Hydrogenated vegetable oils are added to peanut butters at levels of 1--2% to prevent oil separation. Some hydrogenated vegetable oils are known to be sources of trans-fatty acids in the human diet. The addition of these products was not found to result in measurable amounts of trans-fatty acids in the peanut butters analyzed.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









David HammenDavid Hammen

6,58632830




6,58632830








  • 22





    This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 56





    @JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

    – jkej
    yesterday






  • 24





    @JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday








  • 20





    @jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 8





    And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday
















  • 22





    This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 56





    @JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

    – jkej
    yesterday






  • 24





    @JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday








  • 20





    @jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 8





    And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

    – Acccumulation
    yesterday










22




22





This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday





This is similar to the reason why Tic Tacs are labelled as sugar-free, despite consisting of almost nothing but sugar.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday




56




56





@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

– jkej
yesterday





@JanusBahsJacquet I don't think it's remotely similar. The serving size for Tic Tacs is 0.49 g (1 mint) so it couldn't possibly be above 0.5 g sugar per serving, and it is in fact mostly sugar. That is an extreme example highlighting the problem with setting these limits relative to serving size, which is a somewhat arbitrary concept (who eats just one Tic Tac?) . For Skippy peanut butter on the other hand, the serving size is 32 g, so less than 0.5 g trans fat means less than ~1.5%, and the study linked to in this answer shows that actual levels are less than 0.01%.

– jkej
yesterday




24




24





@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

– David Hammen
yesterday







@JanusBahsJacquet, No, it's very different. Tic Tacs are 91% sugar by weight, but since a Tic Tac "serving" is less than 1/2 gram, Tic Tacs have less than the reportable amount of anything. Peanut butter on the other hand contains less than 0.01% trans fat by weight. You'd have to eat an institutional-sized jar of peanut butter as one serving in order to consume 0.5 grams of trans fat.

– David Hammen
yesterday






20




20





@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday





@jkej Actually, it’s not only similar, but identical: the reason in both cases is that the limit is ‘hard-coded’ at 0.5g regardless of percentual content. In both cases it leads to misleading labelling, it’s just much more misleading. Naturally, the situations are very different between the two, but the underlying reason is the same.

– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday




8




8





And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

– Acccumulation
yesterday







And if anyone is curious about the italicization: english.stackexchange.com/questions/170273/…

– Acccumulation
yesterday













10














I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.



Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.



A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.



http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.



https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    "It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

    – jkej
    yesterday








  • 2





    So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

    – Timbo
    yesterday






  • 2





    Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday


















10














I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.



Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.



A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.



http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.



https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2





    "It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

    – jkej
    yesterday








  • 2





    So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

    – Timbo
    yesterday






  • 2





    Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday
















10












10








10







I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.



Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.



A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.



http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.



https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










I note that the label says "Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil" not "Partially Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil". If the oil has been fully hydrogenated it no longer contains trans fats, by definition.



Unfortunately you can't know whether an oil has been fully or partially hydrogenated when the label omits those qualifiers. It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation. It would be wise to assume partial hydrogenation when "Fully" is absent.



A fully hydrogenated oil by itself will be solid at room temperature but I cannot say what would happen to an fully hydrogenated oil suspended in a matrix of peanut bits.



http://www.berkeleywellness.com/healthy-eating/food/article/hydrogenated-oils for more information on hydrogenation and health.



https://www.nationalpeanutboard.org/wellness/why-you-shouldnt-be-scared-oil-in-your-peanut-butter.htm for a highly biased take on the oils used in peanut butter across the industry.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









TimboTimbo

20113




20113




New contributor




Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Timbo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2





    "It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

    – jkej
    yesterday








  • 2





    So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

    – Timbo
    yesterday






  • 2





    Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday
















  • 2





    "It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

    – jkej
    yesterday








  • 2





    So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

    – Timbo
    yesterday






  • 2





    Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday










2




2





"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

– jkej
yesterday







"It seems highly likely to me that the manufacturer did this intentionally to avoid the negative stigma associated with partial hydrogenation." But partially hydrogenated oil typically consists of 30-40% trans fat and according to the study cited in David Hammen's answer, peanut butter typically contains 1-2% hydrogenated vegetable oil. That would give 0.3-0.8% trans fat in the peanut butter, but the study couldn't detect any trans fat (with a detection limit of 0.01%). So either it's fully hydrogenated, or they have some way of doing partial hydrogenation without producing trans fat.

– jkej
yesterday






2




2





So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

– Timbo
yesterday





So perhaps the marketing directive behind omitting the partial/full qualifier is "keep the ingredient list as short as possible".

– Timbo
yesterday




2




2





Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday







Interesting. JIF's labeling makes a point of stating that theirs is fully hydrogenated. Perhaps Skippy's is a blend of fully and partially.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday













-4














The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:



https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm



If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

    – Flydog57
    yesterday






  • 2





    Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 1





    Doesn't answer the question

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday
















-4














The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:



https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm



If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.






share|improve this answer





















  • 9





    That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

    – Flydog57
    yesterday






  • 2





    Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 1





    Doesn't answer the question

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday














-4












-4








-4







The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:



https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm



If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.






share|improve this answer















The FDA has determined that Partially Hydrogenated Oils are not Generally Recognized as Safe (or GRAS) and has established rules for their elimination from the US food supply:



https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm449162.htm



If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday









Ted Delezene

1054




1054










answered yesterday









Flydog57Flydog57

1293




1293








  • 9





    That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

    – Flydog57
    yesterday






  • 2





    Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 1





    Doesn't answer the question

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday














  • 9





    That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

    – Mark
    yesterday






  • 1





    True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

    – Flydog57
    yesterday






  • 2





    Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

    – David Hammen
    yesterday






  • 1





    Doesn't answer the question

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday








9




9





That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

– Mark
yesterday





That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer the question of whether Skippy peanut butter contains trans fat or not.

– Mark
yesterday




1




1





True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

– Flydog57
yesterday





True, but in some ways it does. The FDA order is 3 or 4 years old. Every manufacturer of food products has been working to remove to remove trans fats from their product recipes (trans fats are not natural, they are manufactured). If a manufacturer proclaims their product Trans Fat free on their web site, then it should be trans fat free. I wouldn't be surprised for the FDA to eventually make a rule saying that products can't say "trans fat free" - all products will meet that spec. I agree the accepted answer is correct. But, I thought this information was relevant (& more than a comment)

– Flydog57
yesterday




2




2





Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

– David Hammen
yesterday





Re If any food still contains trans-fat, it won't for long; they are being removed from all foods. That just isn't true. Some foods naturally contain trans fatty acids; the FDA is not banning such foods. What it is doing is making it very, very difficult (if not impossible) to use vegetable oils that are intentionally partially hydrogenated. What about fully hydrogenated vegetable oils? They'll remain okay for use in foods. The problem is that those fully hydrogenated vegetable oils aren't 100% fully hydrogenated. They inevitably contain small amounts of trans fatty acids.

– David Hammen
yesterday




2




2





@Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

– David Hammen
yesterday





@Flydog57 - Re trans fats are not natural -- Cattle in particular are rather good at manufacturing trans fatty acids. Beef contains a good amount, as do dairy products. So do other meat-based products. Some trans fatty acids occur naturally. While partially hydrogenated vegetable oils apparently do compound the problem raised by trans fatty acids, the distinction between "natural" vs. "artificial" trans fatty acids themselves is rather artificial (pun intended). That said, it's good advice to reduce ones intake of ground beef and butter.

– David Hammen
yesterday




1




1





Doesn't answer the question

– Sklivvz
yesterday





Doesn't answer the question

– Sklivvz
yesterday



Popular posts from this blog

Benedict Cumberbatch Contingut Inicis Debut professional Premis Filmografia bàsica Premis i...

Monticle de plataforma Contingut Est de Nord Amèrica Interpretacions Altres cultures Vegeu...

Escacs Janus Enllaços externs Menú de navegacióEscacs JanusJanusschachBrainKing.comChessV