Why does String.replaceAll() work differently in Java 8 from Java 9?What is a serialVersionUID and why should...

Strange blocking on readable secondary after reboot

Why do I have multiple (unassociated) temporal history tables?

Typing Amharic inside a math equation?

How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled

Difference between `vector<int> v;` and `vector<int> v = vector<int>();`

If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?

Early credit roll before the end of the film

Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?

Why do neural networks need so many training examples to perform?

Which password policy is more secure: one password of length 9 vs. two passwords each of length 8?

How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL

What is this metal M-shaped device for?

Can I become debt free or should I file for bankruptcy? How do I manage my debt and finances?

How to tag distinct options/entities without giving any an implicit priority or suggested order?

Why exactly do action photographers need high fps burst cameras?

Roman Numerals equation 1

Magento 2 : Call Helper Without Using __construct in Own Module

Does static make a difference for a const local variable?

How can I install sudo without using su?

Avoiding morning and evening handshakes

Would these multi-classing house rules cause unintended problems?

How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?



Why does String.replaceAll() work differently in Java 8 from Java 9?


What is a serialVersionUID and why should I use it?Regular expression to match a line that doesn't contain a word?Why does Java have transient fields?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I check if a string contains a specific word?Why is subtracting these two times (in 1927) giving a strange result?Why is char[] preferred over String for passwords?Why is it faster to process a sorted array than an unsorted array?Why is executing Java code in comments with certain Unicode characters allowed?Why does array[idx++]+=“a” increase idx once in Java 8 but twice in Java 9 and 10?













10















Why does this code output 02 in java-8 but o2 in java-9 or above?



"o2".replaceAll("([oO])([^[0-9-]])", "0$2")





java regex string java-8 java-9







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

    – Aaron
    1 hour ago


















10















Why does this code output 02 in java-8 but o2 in java-9 or above?



"o2".replaceAll("([oO])([^[0-9-]])", "0$2")





java regex string java-8 java-9







share|improve this question




















  • 1





    A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

    – Aaron
    1 hour ago
















10












10








10


5






Why does this code output 02 in java-8 but o2 in java-9 or above?



"o2".replaceAll("([oO])([^[0-9-]])", "0$2")





java regex string java-8 java-9







share|improve this question
















Why does this code output 02 in java-8 but o2 in java-9 or above?



"o2".replaceAll("([oO])([^[0-9-]])", "0$2")





java regex string java-8 java-9




java regex string java-8 java-9






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 mins ago









Boann

37.1k1290121




37.1k1290121










asked 1 hour ago









Fuyang LiuFuyang Liu

502315




502315








  • 1





    A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

    – Aaron
    1 hour ago
















  • 1





    A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

    – Aaron
    1 hour ago










1




1





A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

– Aaron
1 hour ago







A simplification of the code that still shows the behaviour : Pattern.matches("[^[x]]", "x") returns true with JDK8 and false with JDK9+.

– Aaron
1 hour ago














1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















13














Most likely due to JDK-6609854 and JDK-8189343 which reported negative nested character classes handling (in your example [^[0-9-]]). This behavior was fixed in 9 and 10, but not backported to 8. The bug for Java 8 is explained as:




In Java, the negation does not apply to anything appearing in
nested [brackets]



So [^c] does not match "c", as you would expect.



[^[c]] does match "c". Not what I would expect.



[[^c]] does not match "c"



The same holds true for ranges or property expressions - if they're
inside brackets, a negation at an out level does not affect them.



[^a-z] is opposite from [^[a-z]]







share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago













  • @WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

    – Karol Dowbecki
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Use RegexPlanet

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

    – ruakh
    1 hour ago











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54946363%2fwhy-does-string-replaceall-work-differently-in-java-8-from-java-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13














Most likely due to JDK-6609854 and JDK-8189343 which reported negative nested character classes handling (in your example [^[0-9-]]). This behavior was fixed in 9 and 10, but not backported to 8. The bug for Java 8 is explained as:




In Java, the negation does not apply to anything appearing in
nested [brackets]



So [^c] does not match "c", as you would expect.



[^[c]] does match "c". Not what I would expect.



[[^c]] does not match "c"



The same holds true for ranges or property expressions - if they're
inside brackets, a negation at an out level does not affect them.



[^a-z] is opposite from [^[a-z]]







share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago













  • @WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

    – Karol Dowbecki
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Use RegexPlanet

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

    – ruakh
    1 hour ago
















13














Most likely due to JDK-6609854 and JDK-8189343 which reported negative nested character classes handling (in your example [^[0-9-]]). This behavior was fixed in 9 and 10, but not backported to 8. The bug for Java 8 is explained as:




In Java, the negation does not apply to anything appearing in
nested [brackets]



So [^c] does not match "c", as you would expect.



[^[c]] does match "c". Not what I would expect.



[[^c]] does not match "c"



The same holds true for ranges or property expressions - if they're
inside brackets, a negation at an out level does not affect them.



[^a-z] is opposite from [^[a-z]]







share|improve this answer





















  • 4





    You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago













  • @WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

    – Karol Dowbecki
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Use RegexPlanet

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

    – ruakh
    1 hour ago














13












13








13







Most likely due to JDK-6609854 and JDK-8189343 which reported negative nested character classes handling (in your example [^[0-9-]]). This behavior was fixed in 9 and 10, but not backported to 8. The bug for Java 8 is explained as:




In Java, the negation does not apply to anything appearing in
nested [brackets]



So [^c] does not match "c", as you would expect.



[^[c]] does match "c". Not what I would expect.



[[^c]] does not match "c"



The same holds true for ranges or property expressions - if they're
inside brackets, a negation at an out level does not affect them.



[^a-z] is opposite from [^[a-z]]







share|improve this answer















Most likely due to JDK-6609854 and JDK-8189343 which reported negative nested character classes handling (in your example [^[0-9-]]). This behavior was fixed in 9 and 10, but not backported to 8. The bug for Java 8 is explained as:




In Java, the negation does not apply to anything appearing in
nested [brackets]



So [^c] does not match "c", as you would expect.



[^[c]] does match "c". Not what I would expect.



[[^c]] does not match "c"



The same holds true for ranges or property expressions - if they're
inside brackets, a negation at an out level does not affect them.



[^a-z] is opposite from [^[a-z]]








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Karol DowbeckiKarol Dowbecki

22.5k93355




22.5k93355








  • 4





    You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago













  • @WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

    – Karol Dowbecki
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Use RegexPlanet

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

    – ruakh
    1 hour ago














  • 4





    You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago













  • @WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

    – Karol Dowbecki
    1 hour ago








  • 1





    Use RegexPlanet

    – Wiktor Stribiżew
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

    – ruakh
    1 hour ago








4




4





You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

– Wiktor Stribiżew
1 hour ago







You can't prove the regex does not match the string at regex101, it does not support character class union. In PCRE, [^[0-9-]] matches a char that is not [, digit and - and then a ].

– Wiktor Stribiżew
1 hour ago















@WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

– Karol Dowbecki
1 hour ago







@WiktorStribiżew removed, thanks. Would you suggest some other online tool that supports them?

– Karol Dowbecki
1 hour ago






1




1





Use RegexPlanet

– Wiktor Stribiżew
1 hour ago





Use RegexPlanet

– Wiktor Stribiżew
1 hour ago




1




1





In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

– ruakh
1 hour ago





In case it's not obvious -- the OP can fix this inconsistency by changing [^[0-9-]] to [^0-9-].

– ruakh
1 hour ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54946363%2fwhy-does-string-replaceall-work-differently-in-java-8-from-java-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Benedict Cumberbatch Contingut Inicis Debut professional Premis Filmografia bàsica Premis i...

Image
Persones vivesActors de cinema anglesosActors de teatre anglesosActors de sèries de televisió anglesosActors de doblatgeActors londinencsSherlock HolmesProductors de cinema anglesos LondresAnglaterraHarrowManchester2002Hugh LaurieEl HòbbitBBCMarvelStephen StrangeAvengers: Infinity WarAvengers 4BAFTAtelevisióEmmy Benedict Cumberbatch Retrat de Benedict Cumberbatch (2011) Biografia Naixement Benedict Timothy Carlton Cumberbatch 19 de juliol de 1976 ( 1976-07-19 ) (42 anys) Londres, Anglaterra Nacionalitat Regne Unit Grup ètnic Anglesos Educació Brambletye School Universitat de Manchester Harrow School London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art Alçària 1,83 m Activitat Ocupació Productor de cinema, actor de veu, actor de cinema, actor de teatre i actor Període d'activitat 2001 – Família Cònjuge Sophie Hunter (c. 2015) Fills 1 Pares Timothy Carlton , Wanda Ventham Premis (2014)  Premi Emmy al millor actor...
Read more

Monticle de plataforma Contingut Est de Nord Amèrica Interpretacions Altres cultures Vegeu...

Image
ArqueologiaCultura del MississipíMonuments moviment de terresamerindis dels Estats Unitsperíode arcaicperíode Silvícola o Woodlandcultura del MississippíNord AmèricapiràmideMonticle EmeraldMonticle de Monkstribalsnadius americans Il·lustració del lloc històric de monticles de plataforma que estava situat en l'extrem sud de l'actual estat d'Illinois dels Estats Units. Un monticle de plataforma és qualsevol moviment de terres o monticle destinat a suportar una estructura o activitat. Contingut 1 Est de Nord Amèrica 1.1 Enterraments 2 Interpretacions 3 Altres cultures 4 Vegeu també 5 Referències 6 Enllaços externs Est de Nord Amèrica Els amerindis dels Estats Units van construir monticles de subestructura durant més de mil anys a partir del període arcaic i continuant a través del període Silvícola o Woodland. Moltes cultures arqueològiques diferents com per exemple la cultura del Mississippí de l'est de Nord Amèrica s...
Read more

Escacs Janus Enllaços externs Menú de navegacióEscacs JanusJanusschachBrainKing.comChessV

Image
Variacions dels escacs de CapablancaEscacs a la dècada del 1970 variació d'escacsjanusalfilcavallJanus1978Alemanyapeces d'escacspeonstorrereidamaescacsenrocescac i matGrans Mestres d'escacsVíktor KortxnoiPéter LékóArtur Iussúpov a b c d e f g h i j 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 a b c d e f g h i j Escacs Janus . El Janus (compost per cavall + alfil) és situat a la columnes "b" i "i", al costat de les torres. Els escacs Janus són una variació d'escacs jugada en un tauler de 10×8 caselles. La seva característica diferenciadora és una nova peça, el janus (també coneguda com a arquebisbe o carden...
Read more