Why do no American passenger airlines still operate dedicated cargo flights?Why do some airlines operate...
Does SQL Server 2017, including older versions, support 8k disk sector sizes?
what does しにみえてる mean?
Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits
One Half of Ten; A Riddle
Better VM Ubuntu on Windows 10 or VM Windows 10 on Ubuntu?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Can I write a book of my D&D game?
Why is the copy constructor called twice in this code snippet?
How to say "Brexit" in Latin?
Avoiding morning and evening handshakes
Finding the basis of the intersection of a subspace and span
Which one of these password policies is more secure?
Simple text-based tic-tac-toe
Does theoretical physics suggest that gravity is the exchange of gravitons or deformation/bending of spacetime?
Why is mind meld hard for T'pol in Star Trek: Enterprise?
What incentives do banks have to gather up loans into pools (backed by Ginnie Mae)and selling them?
Is my visa status for all destinations in a flight with connections checked in the beginning or before each flight?
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
Can an insurance company drop you after receiving a bill and refusing to pay?
Can I string the D&D Starter Set campaign into another module, keeping the same characters?
Why Prushim were the ones who "separated"?
Find some digits of factorial 17
Are there any modern advantages of a fire piston?
Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?
Why do no American passenger airlines still operate dedicated cargo flights?
Why do some airlines operate fleets so diversified?Did Pacific Southwest Airlines ever operate flights under VFR?Are cargo and passenger flights flown differently?Why do airlines have intermediate stopovers with no passenger boarding?Do Cargo flights carry anyone other than the crew?Why might American Airlines fly a 767 from JFK to EWR?Why do we see many more 5th and 8th freedom cargo flights than passenger flights?Do ETOPS requirements vary between passenger, cargo, and non-revenue flights?Which items are allowed on passenger flights but not on cargo ones?Why do cargo aircraft still have floors?
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
$endgroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
airline-operations cargo
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
asked 2 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3168
3168
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60624%2fwhy-do-no-american-passenger-airlines-still-operate-dedicated-cargo-flights%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
$endgroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
answered 2 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.7k12457
19.7k12457
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
$endgroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
answered 2 hours ago
DaveDave
65.7k4124237
65.7k4124237
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60624%2fwhy-do-no-american-passenger-airlines-still-operate-dedicated-cargo-flights%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
