What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?A word that describes a...
When can a QA tester start his job?
What is the data structure of $@ in shell?
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
How can a large fleets maintain formation in interstellar space?
Why avoid shared user accounts?
Picture with grey box as background
How do I append a character to the end of every line in an Excel cell?
Absorbing damage with Planeswalker
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
Line of Bones to Travel and Conform to Curve (Like Train on a Track, Snake...)
Avoid page break between paragraphs
How to play electric guitar and bass as a duet
How much mayhem could I cause as a sentient fish?
Why would space fleets be aligned?
Variable is not visible
Potential client has a problematic employee I can't work with
Why was Lupin comfortable with saying Voldemort's name?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
Why do cars have plastic shrouds over the engine?
Am I a Rude Number?
What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry a weapon on board?
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?
A word that describes a process that can be both good and badA word for a collection of unorganized and unrelated little thingsWhat is a word for getting an award in a competition or being one of the top three?Word to describe the structure that holds/stores a shield (and possibly other weapons)Describe someone who doesn't want anything better to happen to anyone elseThe Converse of PhilosophyWord to describe a person to whom good looks mattersWord to describe the philosophical position that any discontinuity in consciousness is tantamount to death?Word or Phrase that describe the action of hastily accusing someone else of a crime you did not commit to escape being accused yourselfWord describing the act of giving someone false confidence
I'm looking for a word that I can use in my writings to describe a bar / pub that doesn't look like it would be a 'rough' place, i.e. one that isn't likely to instigate trouble. I was thinking of the word self-effacing but I think maybe that would be more descriptive of a person rather than a building. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Example usage would be:
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems _______ enough."
Thank you!
single-word-requests adjectives
New contributor
|
show 11 more comments
I'm looking for a word that I can use in my writings to describe a bar / pub that doesn't look like it would be a 'rough' place, i.e. one that isn't likely to instigate trouble. I was thinking of the word self-effacing but I think maybe that would be more descriptive of a person rather than a building. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Example usage would be:
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems _______ enough."
Thank you!
single-word-requests adjectives
New contributor
2
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
2
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
1
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
I'm looking for a word that I can use in my writings to describe a bar / pub that doesn't look like it would be a 'rough' place, i.e. one that isn't likely to instigate trouble. I was thinking of the word self-effacing but I think maybe that would be more descriptive of a person rather than a building. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Example usage would be:
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems _______ enough."
Thank you!
single-word-requests adjectives
New contributor
I'm looking for a word that I can use in my writings to describe a bar / pub that doesn't look like it would be a 'rough' place, i.e. one that isn't likely to instigate trouble. I was thinking of the word self-effacing but I think maybe that would be more descriptive of a person rather than a building. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Example usage would be:
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems _______ enough."
Thank you!
single-word-requests adjectives
single-word-requests adjectives
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Michael Emerson
New contributor
asked 7 hours ago
Michael EmersonMichael Emerson
262
262
New contributor
New contributor
2
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
2
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
1
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
2
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
2
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
1
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago
2
2
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
2
2
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
1
1
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago
|
show 11 more comments
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
Innocuous would be my pick; as in: Some mushrooms look innocuous but are in fact poisonous.
New contributor
add a comment |
Decent
Maybe I'll go in here. It seems decent enough.
"It seems decent enough"--11,000 Google results referring to various places and things, tangible and intangible, with more than one applicable meaning (see link above to ODO).
Locally, a fairly decent place would be used to describe a place that is somewhat modest but appropriate, i.e., fairly clean, moral, safe, etc. (US, SE Region).
As an alternative--low-key--a more youthful, less judgmental word, I think.
add a comment |
I am going to suggest
pleasant
ADJECTIVE
1 Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment.
‘a very pleasant evening’
1.1 (of a person or their manner) friendly and considerate; likeable.
‘they found him pleasant and cooperative’
oxford dict
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems pleasant enough."
This would be said after having walked past a few places that were completely unsuitable, and you are now getting a bit beyond caring about finding the perfect place.
EDIT:
I had originally said pleasant was damning with faint praise but after a comment and a v. quick google I can find nobody who backs me up.
But pleasant is a very low level compliment. It comes far below
exciting, great, fun, entertaining, fabulous, awesome.
Mum: "how was the afternoon at grandmas?"
Teenager: "It was pleasant enough"
Means that it wasn't awful, you didn't spend the entire afternoon looking at your watch waiting for it to end. Some of it was even enjoyable.
(ok honestly a teenager would never say this but it was just to give an extra sense of the way the word would be said)
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
add a comment |
If you are looking for something that contrasts with rough or wild, I would use tame:
: reduced from a state of native wildness especially so as to be tractable and useful to humans : DOMESTICATED
// tame animals
2 : made docile and submissive : SUBDUED
If you really want something that describes only the outward appearance and not the people inside, then there are words like nondescript, bland, and neutral. Or possibly classy or upscale, if you are putting a value judgment on appearance.
But, then, I wouldn't say that rough describes only outward appearance either. Instead, I would use something like garish to describe the outward appearance. (Otherwise, smooth is the antonym of rough in its purely descriptive sense—when it comes only to the building's physical appearance.)
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
By appearance, you would probably be referring to the perceived "atmosphere" surrounding the place. The outer appearance might look "tranquil" enough.
"Maybe I'll go in here. It looks tranquil enough on the outside."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/tranquil
add a comment |
Inconspicuous
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Not clearly visible or attracting attention.
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems peaceful enough."
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
add a comment |
If, as you say, you're judging the place by its outside appearance, you could say
That place looks upscale enough.
There's a difference between upscale and upscale enough. A bar a step or two above a seedy dive might be "upscale enough" even though it is not "upscale".
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Michael Emerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487428%2fwhats-a-good-word-to-describe-a-public-place-that-looks-like-it-wouldnt-be-rou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Innocuous would be my pick; as in: Some mushrooms look innocuous but are in fact poisonous.
New contributor
add a comment |
Innocuous would be my pick; as in: Some mushrooms look innocuous but are in fact poisonous.
New contributor
add a comment |
Innocuous would be my pick; as in: Some mushrooms look innocuous but are in fact poisonous.
New contributor
Innocuous would be my pick; as in: Some mushrooms look innocuous but are in fact poisonous.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
RogerRoger
4014
4014
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Decent
Maybe I'll go in here. It seems decent enough.
"It seems decent enough"--11,000 Google results referring to various places and things, tangible and intangible, with more than one applicable meaning (see link above to ODO).
Locally, a fairly decent place would be used to describe a place that is somewhat modest but appropriate, i.e., fairly clean, moral, safe, etc. (US, SE Region).
As an alternative--low-key--a more youthful, less judgmental word, I think.
add a comment |
Decent
Maybe I'll go in here. It seems decent enough.
"It seems decent enough"--11,000 Google results referring to various places and things, tangible and intangible, with more than one applicable meaning (see link above to ODO).
Locally, a fairly decent place would be used to describe a place that is somewhat modest but appropriate, i.e., fairly clean, moral, safe, etc. (US, SE Region).
As an alternative--low-key--a more youthful, less judgmental word, I think.
add a comment |
Decent
Maybe I'll go in here. It seems decent enough.
"It seems decent enough"--11,000 Google results referring to various places and things, tangible and intangible, with more than one applicable meaning (see link above to ODO).
Locally, a fairly decent place would be used to describe a place that is somewhat modest but appropriate, i.e., fairly clean, moral, safe, etc. (US, SE Region).
As an alternative--low-key--a more youthful, less judgmental word, I think.
Decent
Maybe I'll go in here. It seems decent enough.
"It seems decent enough"--11,000 Google results referring to various places and things, tangible and intangible, with more than one applicable meaning (see link above to ODO).
Locally, a fairly decent place would be used to describe a place that is somewhat modest but appropriate, i.e., fairly clean, moral, safe, etc. (US, SE Region).
As an alternative--low-key--a more youthful, less judgmental word, I think.
answered 1 hour ago
KannEKannE
854114
854114
add a comment |
add a comment |
I am going to suggest
pleasant
ADJECTIVE
1 Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment.
‘a very pleasant evening’
1.1 (of a person or their manner) friendly and considerate; likeable.
‘they found him pleasant and cooperative’
oxford dict
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems pleasant enough."
This would be said after having walked past a few places that were completely unsuitable, and you are now getting a bit beyond caring about finding the perfect place.
EDIT:
I had originally said pleasant was damning with faint praise but after a comment and a v. quick google I can find nobody who backs me up.
But pleasant is a very low level compliment. It comes far below
exciting, great, fun, entertaining, fabulous, awesome.
Mum: "how was the afternoon at grandmas?"
Teenager: "It was pleasant enough"
Means that it wasn't awful, you didn't spend the entire afternoon looking at your watch waiting for it to end. Some of it was even enjoyable.
(ok honestly a teenager would never say this but it was just to give an extra sense of the way the word would be said)
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
add a comment |
I am going to suggest
pleasant
ADJECTIVE
1 Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment.
‘a very pleasant evening’
1.1 (of a person or their manner) friendly and considerate; likeable.
‘they found him pleasant and cooperative’
oxford dict
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems pleasant enough."
This would be said after having walked past a few places that were completely unsuitable, and you are now getting a bit beyond caring about finding the perfect place.
EDIT:
I had originally said pleasant was damning with faint praise but after a comment and a v. quick google I can find nobody who backs me up.
But pleasant is a very low level compliment. It comes far below
exciting, great, fun, entertaining, fabulous, awesome.
Mum: "how was the afternoon at grandmas?"
Teenager: "It was pleasant enough"
Means that it wasn't awful, you didn't spend the entire afternoon looking at your watch waiting for it to end. Some of it was even enjoyable.
(ok honestly a teenager would never say this but it was just to give an extra sense of the way the word would be said)
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
add a comment |
I am going to suggest
pleasant
ADJECTIVE
1 Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment.
‘a very pleasant evening’
1.1 (of a person or their manner) friendly and considerate; likeable.
‘they found him pleasant and cooperative’
oxford dict
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems pleasant enough."
This would be said after having walked past a few places that were completely unsuitable, and you are now getting a bit beyond caring about finding the perfect place.
EDIT:
I had originally said pleasant was damning with faint praise but after a comment and a v. quick google I can find nobody who backs me up.
But pleasant is a very low level compliment. It comes far below
exciting, great, fun, entertaining, fabulous, awesome.
Mum: "how was the afternoon at grandmas?"
Teenager: "It was pleasant enough"
Means that it wasn't awful, you didn't spend the entire afternoon looking at your watch waiting for it to end. Some of it was even enjoyable.
(ok honestly a teenager would never say this but it was just to give an extra sense of the way the word would be said)
I am going to suggest
pleasant
ADJECTIVE
1 Giving a sense of happy satisfaction or enjoyment.
‘a very pleasant evening’
1.1 (of a person or their manner) friendly and considerate; likeable.
‘they found him pleasant and cooperative’
oxford dict
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems pleasant enough."
This would be said after having walked past a few places that were completely unsuitable, and you are now getting a bit beyond caring about finding the perfect place.
EDIT:
I had originally said pleasant was damning with faint praise but after a comment and a v. quick google I can find nobody who backs me up.
But pleasant is a very low level compliment. It comes far below
exciting, great, fun, entertaining, fabulous, awesome.
Mum: "how was the afternoon at grandmas?"
Teenager: "It was pleasant enough"
Means that it wasn't awful, you didn't spend the entire afternoon looking at your watch waiting for it to end. Some of it was even enjoyable.
(ok honestly a teenager would never say this but it was just to give an extra sense of the way the word would be said)
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
WendyGWendyG
1,355212
1,355212
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
add a comment |
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
This was my choice and it's a fairly common word to use referring to an unknown cafe/pub/whatever. I don't think it's faint praise really. I think pleasant is at least as positive as 'good' but it has a different connotation. Pleasant implies quiet, nice, civilised, a lot of words already offered as answers. So probably not used to refer to a nightclub but perfect for a tea shop. When William Blake referred to England as a green and pleasant land I don't think it was intended as faint praise and while it's 200 years old and language drifts it still seems like a popular and patriotic term.
– Eric Nolan
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan to me it feels equal to "nice", it wasn't lovely, fantastic, brilliant it was pleasant, "how was the afternoon?" "it was pleasant enough"
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
@EricNolan but nobody on the internet seems to back me up on this
– WendyG
1 hour ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
Adding 'enough' weakens the adjective a little too. I think you are being a little too hard on pleasant expecting it to equate with superlatives like great, fantastic, fabulous etc. It is certainly less than those. However 'rough' is also not a very extreme description, not compared to 'hell hole', 'dangerous', 'nightmare', etc. Obviously this is not a critical issue, I just felt the need to defend the less than awesome. It seems that often a thing has to be great and anything less than that means it sucks. There is a place for nice and pleasant as genuine, if inexuberant, praise.
– Eric Nolan
45 mins ago
add a comment |
If you are looking for something that contrasts with rough or wild, I would use tame:
: reduced from a state of native wildness especially so as to be tractable and useful to humans : DOMESTICATED
// tame animals
2 : made docile and submissive : SUBDUED
If you really want something that describes only the outward appearance and not the people inside, then there are words like nondescript, bland, and neutral. Or possibly classy or upscale, if you are putting a value judgment on appearance.
But, then, I wouldn't say that rough describes only outward appearance either. Instead, I would use something like garish to describe the outward appearance. (Otherwise, smooth is the antonym of rough in its purely descriptive sense—when it comes only to the building's physical appearance.)
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
If you are looking for something that contrasts with rough or wild, I would use tame:
: reduced from a state of native wildness especially so as to be tractable and useful to humans : DOMESTICATED
// tame animals
2 : made docile and submissive : SUBDUED
If you really want something that describes only the outward appearance and not the people inside, then there are words like nondescript, bland, and neutral. Or possibly classy or upscale, if you are putting a value judgment on appearance.
But, then, I wouldn't say that rough describes only outward appearance either. Instead, I would use something like garish to describe the outward appearance. (Otherwise, smooth is the antonym of rough in its purely descriptive sense—when it comes only to the building's physical appearance.)
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
If you are looking for something that contrasts with rough or wild, I would use tame:
: reduced from a state of native wildness especially so as to be tractable and useful to humans : DOMESTICATED
// tame animals
2 : made docile and submissive : SUBDUED
If you really want something that describes only the outward appearance and not the people inside, then there are words like nondescript, bland, and neutral. Or possibly classy or upscale, if you are putting a value judgment on appearance.
But, then, I wouldn't say that rough describes only outward appearance either. Instead, I would use something like garish to describe the outward appearance. (Otherwise, smooth is the antonym of rough in its purely descriptive sense—when it comes only to the building's physical appearance.)
If you are looking for something that contrasts with rough or wild, I would use tame:
: reduced from a state of native wildness especially so as to be tractable and useful to humans : DOMESTICATED
// tame animals
2 : made docile and submissive : SUBDUED
If you really want something that describes only the outward appearance and not the people inside, then there are words like nondescript, bland, and neutral. Or possibly classy or upscale, if you are putting a value judgment on appearance.
But, then, I wouldn't say that rough describes only outward appearance either. Instead, I would use something like garish to describe the outward appearance. (Otherwise, smooth is the antonym of rough in its purely descriptive sense—when it comes only to the building's physical appearance.)
answered 4 hours ago
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
17.7k32143
17.7k32143
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
Thanks for the suggestions. Actually, in the next scene he comments that the bar looks 'classier than the outside' so perhaps nondescript or bland would be a better option in this case.
– Michael Emerson
3 hours ago
add a comment |
By appearance, you would probably be referring to the perceived "atmosphere" surrounding the place. The outer appearance might look "tranquil" enough.
"Maybe I'll go in here. It looks tranquil enough on the outside."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/tranquil
add a comment |
By appearance, you would probably be referring to the perceived "atmosphere" surrounding the place. The outer appearance might look "tranquil" enough.
"Maybe I'll go in here. It looks tranquil enough on the outside."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/tranquil
add a comment |
By appearance, you would probably be referring to the perceived "atmosphere" surrounding the place. The outer appearance might look "tranquil" enough.
"Maybe I'll go in here. It looks tranquil enough on the outside."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/tranquil
By appearance, you would probably be referring to the perceived "atmosphere" surrounding the place. The outer appearance might look "tranquil" enough.
"Maybe I'll go in here. It looks tranquil enough on the outside."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/tranquil
answered 5 hours ago
user22542user22542
2,51539
2,51539
add a comment |
add a comment |
Inconspicuous
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Not clearly visible or attracting attention.
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Inconspicuous
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Not clearly visible or attracting attention.
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Inconspicuous
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Not clearly visible or attracting attention.
Inconspicuous
From Oxford Dictionaries:
Not clearly visible or attracting attention.
answered 7 hours ago
PamPam
4,2931731
4,2931731
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
That's a pretty good choice, thanks I'll try that I think.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
1
1
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
That really doesn't make much sense I'm afraid - you can check the dictionary definition of "inconspicuous". (Indeed, many "rough" places are often inconspicuous!)
– Fattie
5 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
@Fattie This is kind of the point - the main character is making a judgement call on the bar by the outer appearance. Which most people would do; he's assuming it would be fine based on the way it looks and where it's located.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
Not a big deal @MichaelEmerson but: the OP is trying to decide if it is the sort of place where there are brawls and crime or if it is a peaceful, upright, non-criminal type of place. Really - this simply has no relationship to whether or not it is conspicuous. Conspicuous means nothing more than "stands out". (For example, very simply, something that is "large" is conspicuous.)
– Fattie
3 hours ago
1
1
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
Again i have to alert you that "conspicuous" is, simply, wrong. Be aware that you could write: the bar was conspicuously violent ... or ... the bar was conspicuously peaceful. I alert you that a bar being "inconspicuous" tends to hint - if anything - that it is a criminal bar (it's "hidden, low-key"). Anyway hope it helps, bye !
– Fattie
3 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems peaceful enough."
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
add a comment |
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems peaceful enough."
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
add a comment |
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems peaceful enough."
"Maybe I'll go in here. It seems peaceful enough."
answered 5 hours ago
chasly from UKchasly from UK
23.5k13172
23.5k13172
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
I'm not sure that peaceful would describe the appearance of a building - more like how it would be once he's gone inside.
– Michael Emerson
4 hours ago
add a comment |
If, as you say, you're judging the place by its outside appearance, you could say
That place looks upscale enough.
There's a difference between upscale and upscale enough. A bar a step or two above a seedy dive might be "upscale enough" even though it is not "upscale".
add a comment |
If, as you say, you're judging the place by its outside appearance, you could say
That place looks upscale enough.
There's a difference between upscale and upscale enough. A bar a step or two above a seedy dive might be "upscale enough" even though it is not "upscale".
add a comment |
If, as you say, you're judging the place by its outside appearance, you could say
That place looks upscale enough.
There's a difference between upscale and upscale enough. A bar a step or two above a seedy dive might be "upscale enough" even though it is not "upscale".
If, as you say, you're judging the place by its outside appearance, you could say
That place looks upscale enough.
There's a difference between upscale and upscale enough. A bar a step or two above a seedy dive might be "upscale enough" even though it is not "upscale".
answered 2 hours ago
TRomanoTRomano
16.6k21946
16.6k21946
add a comment |
add a comment |
Michael Emerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Emerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Emerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Michael Emerson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487428%2fwhats-a-good-word-to-describe-a-public-place-that-looks-like-it-wouldnt-be-rou%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
How about "quiet"?
– TRomano
7 hours ago
I was thinking more of a description of the appearance of the place from outside, rather than inside.
– Michael Emerson
7 hours ago
Hi, I've edited to suggest a sample sentence. Single word requests require them, and it'll save some negativity. Please feel free to edit it..."it looks ____ on the outside".
– Pam
7 hours ago
2
perhaps "It seems tame enough..."
– Fattie
5 hours ago
1
Personally I would refer to it as salubrious - literally health giving but some dictionaries include a metaphorical sense of “not run down”.
– pbasdf
4 hours ago