Finding a mistake using Mayer-VietorisProve that $H_n(A sqcup B) cong H_n(A) oplus H_n(B)$ for all $n in...
What are "industrial chops"?
Son necesarias las etiquetas header, section, footer etc
Can a Pact of the Blade warlock use the correct existing pact magic weapon so it functions as a "Returning" weapon?
kill -0 <PID> は何をするのでしょうか?
Replacement expressions
How to say "Brexit" in Latin?
When can a QA tester start his job?
Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?
Am I a Rude Number?
How to prevent cleaner from hanging my lock screen in Ubuntu 16.04
Early credit roll before the end of the film
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
How to make ice magic work from a scientific point of view?
How can animals be objects of ethics without being subjects as well?
Writing a character who is going through a civilizing process without overdoing it?
Why is Agricola named as such?
Why would space fleets be aligned?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
Publishing research using outdated methods
Why did other German political parties disband so fast when Hitler was appointed chancellor?
How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
Finding a mistake using Mayer-Vietoris
Prove that $H_n(A sqcup B) cong H_n(A) oplus H_n(B)$ for all $n in mathbb{Z}$.Rigorous application of Mayer-Vietoris to a quotient of $S^{2}times I$Mayer-Vietoris where $Acap B$ bounds $A$ and $B$Calculating the homology groups of a simplicial complex using a Mayer-Vietoris sequence$H_1(S^1)$ with Mayer-Vietoris sequenceMisunderstanding connected with the Mayer-Vietoris sequenceCompute the homology groups using Mayer-Vietoris sequenceComputing the homology of genus $g$ surface, using Mayer-VietorisConfusion in using Mayer-Vietoris theoremHomology of Klein bottle with Mayer-Vietoris
$begingroup$
I was computing the homology of $S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$, where $I_i=[0,1]$ for all $i$ (they are being identified with an embedding). Intuitively, this should be homotopy equivalent to $S^1$, since removing one interval gives something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^3$, removing another one gives an espace homotopic to $S^2$, removing the third one results in something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^2$ and finaly the last one ends up with a space homotopic to $S^1$. Therefore, $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)=0$.
But in other calculations this caused me some problems so I decide to do it formally using Mayer-Vietoris. I had already computed $H_*(S^3-Isqcup I)$, giving me a consistent result with the intuition above, i.e. $H_2(S^3-Isqcup I)=mathbb{Z}$.
Now I decompose $S^3=(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^2 I_i)cup (S^3-coprod_{i=3}^4 I_i)$. From Mayer-Vietoris there is a short exact sequence
$$0to H_3(S^3)to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to H_2(S^3-I_1sqcup I_2)oplus H_2(S^3-I_3sqcup I_4)to 0$$
From my calculations this would be
$0tomathbb{Z}to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to mathbb{Z}oplusmathbb{Z}to 0$
But then $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)neq 0$, which is inconsistent with my first reasoning. Where is the mistake?
general-topology proof-verification algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was computing the homology of $S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$, where $I_i=[0,1]$ for all $i$ (they are being identified with an embedding). Intuitively, this should be homotopy equivalent to $S^1$, since removing one interval gives something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^3$, removing another one gives an espace homotopic to $S^2$, removing the third one results in something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^2$ and finaly the last one ends up with a space homotopic to $S^1$. Therefore, $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)=0$.
But in other calculations this caused me some problems so I decide to do it formally using Mayer-Vietoris. I had already computed $H_*(S^3-Isqcup I)$, giving me a consistent result with the intuition above, i.e. $H_2(S^3-Isqcup I)=mathbb{Z}$.
Now I decompose $S^3=(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^2 I_i)cup (S^3-coprod_{i=3}^4 I_i)$. From Mayer-Vietoris there is a short exact sequence
$$0to H_3(S^3)to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to H_2(S^3-I_1sqcup I_2)oplus H_2(S^3-I_3sqcup I_4)to 0$$
From my calculations this would be
$0tomathbb{Z}to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to mathbb{Z}oplusmathbb{Z}to 0$
But then $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)neq 0$, which is inconsistent with my first reasoning. Where is the mistake?
general-topology proof-verification algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was computing the homology of $S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$, where $I_i=[0,1]$ for all $i$ (they are being identified with an embedding). Intuitively, this should be homotopy equivalent to $S^1$, since removing one interval gives something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^3$, removing another one gives an espace homotopic to $S^2$, removing the third one results in something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^2$ and finaly the last one ends up with a space homotopic to $S^1$. Therefore, $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)=0$.
But in other calculations this caused me some problems so I decide to do it formally using Mayer-Vietoris. I had already computed $H_*(S^3-Isqcup I)$, giving me a consistent result with the intuition above, i.e. $H_2(S^3-Isqcup I)=mathbb{Z}$.
Now I decompose $S^3=(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^2 I_i)cup (S^3-coprod_{i=3}^4 I_i)$. From Mayer-Vietoris there is a short exact sequence
$$0to H_3(S^3)to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to H_2(S^3-I_1sqcup I_2)oplus H_2(S^3-I_3sqcup I_4)to 0$$
From my calculations this would be
$0tomathbb{Z}to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to mathbb{Z}oplusmathbb{Z}to 0$
But then $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)neq 0$, which is inconsistent with my first reasoning. Where is the mistake?
general-topology proof-verification algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
$endgroup$
I was computing the homology of $S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$, where $I_i=[0,1]$ for all $i$ (they are being identified with an embedding). Intuitively, this should be homotopy equivalent to $S^1$, since removing one interval gives something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^3$, removing another one gives an espace homotopic to $S^2$, removing the third one results in something homotopic to $mathbb{R}^2$ and finaly the last one ends up with a space homotopic to $S^1$. Therefore, $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)=0$.
But in other calculations this caused me some problems so I decide to do it formally using Mayer-Vietoris. I had already computed $H_*(S^3-Isqcup I)$, giving me a consistent result with the intuition above, i.e. $H_2(S^3-Isqcup I)=mathbb{Z}$.
Now I decompose $S^3=(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^2 I_i)cup (S^3-coprod_{i=3}^4 I_i)$. From Mayer-Vietoris there is a short exact sequence
$$0to H_3(S^3)to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to H_2(S^3-I_1sqcup I_2)oplus H_2(S^3-I_3sqcup I_4)to 0$$
From my calculations this would be
$0tomathbb{Z}to H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)to mathbb{Z}oplusmathbb{Z}to 0$
But then $H_2(S^3-coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i)neq 0$, which is inconsistent with my first reasoning. Where is the mistake?
general-topology proof-verification algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
general-topology proof-verification algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
edited 52 mins ago
Javi
asked 1 hour ago
JaviJavi
2,7572827
2,7572827
2
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By your argument at the beginning, removing four points from a two-sphere should yield something which is homotopy equivalent to a zero-sphere. This is obviously not true. Your error is that after getting a space homotopic to $S^2$, you proceed as if it is actually homeomorphic to $S^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3130278%2ffinding-a-mistake-using-mayer-vietoris%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
By your argument at the beginning, removing four points from a two-sphere should yield something which is homotopy equivalent to a zero-sphere. This is obviously not true. Your error is that after getting a space homotopic to $S^2$, you proceed as if it is actually homeomorphic to $S^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By your argument at the beginning, removing four points from a two-sphere should yield something which is homotopy equivalent to a zero-sphere. This is obviously not true. Your error is that after getting a space homotopic to $S^2$, you proceed as if it is actually homeomorphic to $S^2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By your argument at the beginning, removing four points from a two-sphere should yield something which is homotopy equivalent to a zero-sphere. This is obviously not true. Your error is that after getting a space homotopic to $S^2$, you proceed as if it is actually homeomorphic to $S^2$.
$endgroup$
By your argument at the beginning, removing four points from a two-sphere should yield something which is homotopy equivalent to a zero-sphere. This is obviously not true. Your error is that after getting a space homotopic to $S^2$, you proceed as if it is actually homeomorphic to $S^2$.
edited 12 mins ago
answered 39 mins ago
Carsten SCarsten S
7,02311334
7,02311334
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oh that's it, I was so dumb! Thank you
$endgroup$
– Javi
37 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Javi, happens to all of us.
$endgroup$
– Carsten S
36 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3130278%2ffinding-a-mistake-using-mayer-vietoris%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
How exactly is $coprod_{i=1}^4 I_i$ a subset of $S^3$? And why not just remove four distinct points?
$endgroup$
– Servaes
55 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes I'm considering an embedding, the most simple possible, for example an isometry onto its image on $mathbb{R}^3$ and then adding the point of infinity. Anyways, there is a theorem saying that $widetilde{H}_i(S^n-h(D^k))=0$ for all $i$ and every embedding $h$ of $D^k$ into $S^n$, so I am using that implicitly for $n=3,k=1$.
$endgroup$
– Javi
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Servaes My original problem incluided intervals rather than points, but the result should be the same, and I would obtain the same mistake, so I guess I'm doing something wrong somewhere.
$endgroup$
– Javi
50 mins ago