Explain the objections to these measures against human traffickingWhat are the objections to implementing a...

Finding a mistake using Mayer-Vietoris

Why is the copy constructor called twice in this code snippet?

Does SQL Server 2017, including older versions, support 8k disk sector sizes?

Why did the villain in the first Men in Black movie care about Earth's Cockroaches?

Early credit roll before the end of the film

How to limit sight distance to 1 KM

Can an insurance company drop you after receiving a bill and refusing to pay?

初めてです, is '初めて' an adverb?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

How can I get my players to come to the game session after agreeing to a date?

A title for a history book

Is boss over stepping boundary/micromanaging?

Why would Pakistan closing its air space cancel flights not headed to Pakistan itself?

Can placing a counter on a creature after it has been assigned as an attacker remove it from combat

Simple text-based tic-tac-toe

What incentives do banks have to gather up loans into pools (backed by Ginnie Mae)and selling them?

How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?

How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL

Which one of these password policies is more secure?

Moving from one room/cave to another within the same dungeon

Am I a Rude Number?

Can I write a book of my D&D game?

In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory?

Is it possible to grant users sftp access without shell access? If yes, how is it implemented?



Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking


What are the objections to implementing a flat rate income tax in the United States?Is the human rights group Amnesty International perceived as liberal in the United States?Why didn't the USA (west) take measures to stop China from became the new superpower while they can?A small set of questions on objections to the Electoral College vote by members of CongressWho were these people during the US President's press conference on infrastructure the other day?Can someone please explain these numbers and how the Republican won the CA US 21st congressional district in 2016?What are the primary objections Democrats have to a border wall?How to explain the difference between Federal, State and Local governments to a grade schooler?Available data on persons charged with human trafficking on the Southwest border?Did Trump ever explain why he wants to make Mexico pay for the wall?













1















In the state I live there are some measures being discussed that are meant to combat human trafficking. A couple of the ones I've heard are:




  1. One is to close down illicit massage parlors


  2. Another is for hotel workers to report suspected victims of human trafficking (who are likely underage)



Now, I've heard that there is some controversy to these suggestions. Some say that 1 will force victims out onto the streets and into more dangerous situations. I don't understand this objection as I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue.



An objection to 2 I heard was that 2 would put victims at higher risk of retribution from traffickers, and that it should only be done with the consent of the victim. This too I do not understand, as I thought there would be discretion on part of the law and that victims might have a hard time speaking up.



Could someone explain the measures and the objections further? Some of these come from advocacy groups and while I value their insight and respect their work I have a hard time fully understanding. I don't know how to ask but I would also appreciate hearing any other aspects of the debate too










share|improve this question























  • "...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

    – John Doe
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

    – Jeff Lambert
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

    – PoloHoleSet
    33 mins ago
















1















In the state I live there are some measures being discussed that are meant to combat human trafficking. A couple of the ones I've heard are:




  1. One is to close down illicit massage parlors


  2. Another is for hotel workers to report suspected victims of human trafficking (who are likely underage)



Now, I've heard that there is some controversy to these suggestions. Some say that 1 will force victims out onto the streets and into more dangerous situations. I don't understand this objection as I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue.



An objection to 2 I heard was that 2 would put victims at higher risk of retribution from traffickers, and that it should only be done with the consent of the victim. This too I do not understand, as I thought there would be discretion on part of the law and that victims might have a hard time speaking up.



Could someone explain the measures and the objections further? Some of these come from advocacy groups and while I value their insight and respect their work I have a hard time fully understanding. I don't know how to ask but I would also appreciate hearing any other aspects of the debate too










share|improve this question























  • "...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

    – John Doe
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

    – Jeff Lambert
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

    – PoloHoleSet
    33 mins ago














1












1








1








In the state I live there are some measures being discussed that are meant to combat human trafficking. A couple of the ones I've heard are:




  1. One is to close down illicit massage parlors


  2. Another is for hotel workers to report suspected victims of human trafficking (who are likely underage)



Now, I've heard that there is some controversy to these suggestions. Some say that 1 will force victims out onto the streets and into more dangerous situations. I don't understand this objection as I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue.



An objection to 2 I heard was that 2 would put victims at higher risk of retribution from traffickers, and that it should only be done with the consent of the victim. This too I do not understand, as I thought there would be discretion on part of the law and that victims might have a hard time speaking up.



Could someone explain the measures and the objections further? Some of these come from advocacy groups and while I value their insight and respect their work I have a hard time fully understanding. I don't know how to ask but I would also appreciate hearing any other aspects of the debate too










share|improve this question














In the state I live there are some measures being discussed that are meant to combat human trafficking. A couple of the ones I've heard are:




  1. One is to close down illicit massage parlors


  2. Another is for hotel workers to report suspected victims of human trafficking (who are likely underage)



Now, I've heard that there is some controversy to these suggestions. Some say that 1 will force victims out onto the streets and into more dangerous situations. I don't understand this objection as I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue.



An objection to 2 I heard was that 2 would put victims at higher risk of retribution from traffickers, and that it should only be done with the consent of the victim. This too I do not understand, as I thought there would be discretion on part of the law and that victims might have a hard time speaking up.



Could someone explain the measures and the objections further? Some of these come from advocacy groups and while I value their insight and respect their work I have a hard time fully understanding. I don't know how to ask but I would also appreciate hearing any other aspects of the debate too







united-states human-trafficking






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









user1675016user1675016

44928




44928













  • "...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

    – John Doe
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

    – Jeff Lambert
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

    – PoloHoleSet
    33 mins ago



















  • "...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

    – John Doe
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

    – Jeff Lambert
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

    – PoloHoleSet
    33 mins ago

















"...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

– John Doe
1 hour ago





"...I had imagined that shutting down the shop would include rescue" In a perfect world, yes. However, just as in instances where children obviously need to be removed from an abusive situation, people fall through the cracks. This is neither an argument for nor against the proposal in question, just elaborating on the realities of the situation.

– John Doe
1 hour ago




1




1





Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

– Jeff Lambert
1 hour ago





Looking at your profile, it seems the state you're asking about is Florida. The second proposal you list is most likely SB 540, but it's unclear to me whether the first is the same one or a different one entirely. Adding this here to help potential answerers.

– Jeff Lambert
1 hour ago




1




1





Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

– PoloHoleSet
33 mins ago





Probably the objection about forcing the victims into the street are not necessarily about the specific victims in any one massage parlor, as much as the general population and potential future victims.

– PoloHoleSet
33 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














For case 1, the unstated assumptions are that prostitution will take place regardless of the government's attempts to stop it, and even if there are illicit massage parlors populated with victims of human trafficking, there are also illicit massage parlors with voluntary prostitutes. The voluntary prostitutes will not be "rescued" because, they don't need "rescuing" and if they keep doing sex work they will do it elsewhere. There are many values of "elsewhere" more dangerous for the prostitute and less desirable for society than an illicit massage parlor, e.g. city streets.



For case 2, most mandatory reporting laws require that the mandatory reporter's personally identifying information be taken and made available. This information may be published to other law enforcement personnel and may appear in court documents depending on how a case proceeds. The reporter therefore can be subject to intimidation. Also, if you know who the reporter is, it is a trivial exercise for a criminal organization to determine when and where that person works and therefore determine who is likely to be the victim that caused the report to be filed.






share|improve this answer
























  • For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

    – jamesqf
    12 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39118%2fexplain-the-objections-to-these-measures-against-human-trafficking%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














For case 1, the unstated assumptions are that prostitution will take place regardless of the government's attempts to stop it, and even if there are illicit massage parlors populated with victims of human trafficking, there are also illicit massage parlors with voluntary prostitutes. The voluntary prostitutes will not be "rescued" because, they don't need "rescuing" and if they keep doing sex work they will do it elsewhere. There are many values of "elsewhere" more dangerous for the prostitute and less desirable for society than an illicit massage parlor, e.g. city streets.



For case 2, most mandatory reporting laws require that the mandatory reporter's personally identifying information be taken and made available. This information may be published to other law enforcement personnel and may appear in court documents depending on how a case proceeds. The reporter therefore can be subject to intimidation. Also, if you know who the reporter is, it is a trivial exercise for a criminal organization to determine when and where that person works and therefore determine who is likely to be the victim that caused the report to be filed.






share|improve this answer
























  • For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

    – jamesqf
    12 mins ago
















5














For case 1, the unstated assumptions are that prostitution will take place regardless of the government's attempts to stop it, and even if there are illicit massage parlors populated with victims of human trafficking, there are also illicit massage parlors with voluntary prostitutes. The voluntary prostitutes will not be "rescued" because, they don't need "rescuing" and if they keep doing sex work they will do it elsewhere. There are many values of "elsewhere" more dangerous for the prostitute and less desirable for society than an illicit massage parlor, e.g. city streets.



For case 2, most mandatory reporting laws require that the mandatory reporter's personally identifying information be taken and made available. This information may be published to other law enforcement personnel and may appear in court documents depending on how a case proceeds. The reporter therefore can be subject to intimidation. Also, if you know who the reporter is, it is a trivial exercise for a criminal organization to determine when and where that person works and therefore determine who is likely to be the victim that caused the report to be filed.






share|improve this answer
























  • For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

    – jamesqf
    12 mins ago














5












5








5







For case 1, the unstated assumptions are that prostitution will take place regardless of the government's attempts to stop it, and even if there are illicit massage parlors populated with victims of human trafficking, there are also illicit massage parlors with voluntary prostitutes. The voluntary prostitutes will not be "rescued" because, they don't need "rescuing" and if they keep doing sex work they will do it elsewhere. There are many values of "elsewhere" more dangerous for the prostitute and less desirable for society than an illicit massage parlor, e.g. city streets.



For case 2, most mandatory reporting laws require that the mandatory reporter's personally identifying information be taken and made available. This information may be published to other law enforcement personnel and may appear in court documents depending on how a case proceeds. The reporter therefore can be subject to intimidation. Also, if you know who the reporter is, it is a trivial exercise for a criminal organization to determine when and where that person works and therefore determine who is likely to be the victim that caused the report to be filed.






share|improve this answer













For case 1, the unstated assumptions are that prostitution will take place regardless of the government's attempts to stop it, and even if there are illicit massage parlors populated with victims of human trafficking, there are also illicit massage parlors with voluntary prostitutes. The voluntary prostitutes will not be "rescued" because, they don't need "rescuing" and if they keep doing sex work they will do it elsewhere. There are many values of "elsewhere" more dangerous for the prostitute and less desirable for society than an illicit massage parlor, e.g. city streets.



For case 2, most mandatory reporting laws require that the mandatory reporter's personally identifying information be taken and made available. This information may be published to other law enforcement personnel and may appear in court documents depending on how a case proceeds. The reporter therefore can be subject to intimidation. Also, if you know who the reporter is, it is a trivial exercise for a criminal organization to determine when and where that person works and therefore determine who is likely to be the victim that caused the report to be filed.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









JoeJoe

1,204110




1,204110













  • For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

    – jamesqf
    12 mins ago



















  • For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

    – jamesqf
    12 mins ago

















For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

– jamesqf
12 mins ago





For case #1, I've always found it rather difficult to understand why "human trafficing" would be involved at all in "normal" prostitution. (Obviously child porn &c could be different.) It would seem far more efficient simply to hire willing workers, rather than to maintain a substantial network of thugs &c.

– jamesqf
12 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39118%2fexplain-the-objections-to-these-measures-against-human-trafficking%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Benedict Cumberbatch Contingut Inicis Debut professional Premis Filmografia bàsica Premis i...

Monticle de plataforma Contingut Est de Nord Amèrica Interpretacions Altres cultures Vegeu...

Escacs Janus Enllaços externs Menú de navegacióEscacs JanusJanusschachBrainKing.comChessV