Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace...

Use two 8s and two 3s to make the number 24

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

Why am I able to open Wireshark in macOS without root privileges?

Difference between i++ and (i)++ in C

Can you tell from a blurry photo if focus was too close or too far?

Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

Is a new Boolean field better than a null reference when a value can be meaningfully absent?

Play Zip, Zap, Zop

Why did the villain in the first Men in Black movie care about Earth's Cockroaches?

Positioning node within rectangle Tikz

What are the exceptions to Natural Selection?

Is there a Linux system call to create a “view” of a range of a file?

What does it mean for a caliber to be flat shooting?

Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?

use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How does Leonard in "Memento" remember reading and writing?

Making him into a bully (how to show mild violence)

A curious equality of integrals involving the prime counting function?

In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory?

Removing disk while game is suspended

Has any human ever had the choice to leave Earth permanently?



Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization.”


Can a managed package cease to depend on another managed package?Managed app installation on Salesforce Production OrgWhen building a package with a dependency how is the minimum version of the dependent package determined?Why does code coverage consider pre-installed packages?When does it make sense to add a Connected App to a Managed Package?Does post-install script run when a patch version of the package is installed?From inside a Salesforce packaging org, how do you query the list of created versions for a managed package?What namespace to use when developing Lightning components for a managed package?How to specify namespace and partition for Org Cache when creating managed package?Is there a way to figure out how a previously installed package was installed when upgrading?













1















I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).



The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.



The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."










share|improve this question

























  • I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

    – Matt Lacey
    2 hours ago











  • So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

    – Kenji776
    2 hours ago











  • I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago
















1















I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).



The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.



The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."










share|improve this question

























  • I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

    – Matt Lacey
    2 hours ago











  • So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

    – Kenji776
    2 hours ago











  • I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago














1












1








1








I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).



The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.



The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."










share|improve this question
















I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).



The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.



The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."







managed-package






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Matt Lacey

20.9k547120




20.9k547120










asked 3 hours ago









Kenji776Kenji776

285412




285412













  • I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

    – Matt Lacey
    2 hours ago











  • So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

    – Kenji776
    2 hours ago











  • I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago



















  • I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

    – Matt Lacey
    2 hours ago











  • So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

    – Kenji776
    2 hours ago











  • I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago

















I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

– Matt Lacey
2 hours ago





I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.

– Matt Lacey
2 hours ago













So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

– Kenji776
2 hours ago





So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?

– Kenji776
2 hours ago













I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

– Matt Lacey
1 hour ago





I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.

– Matt Lacey
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).






share|improve this answer
























  • Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago











  • @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago











  • I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago











  • Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago



















0














I was actually able to find a fix for this. I uninstalled the Salesforce Connected Apps package which removed the reference to it in all my code. I was then able to upload a new version of the package which did not have the dependency and hence no error! Thanks @sfdcfox for pointing me the right direction!






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "459"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).






    share|improve this answer
























    • Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago











    • @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

      – sfdcfox
      1 hour ago











    • I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

      – Matt Lacey
      1 hour ago











    • Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago
















    3














    You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).






    share|improve this answer
























    • Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago











    • @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

      – sfdcfox
      1 hour ago











    • I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

      – Matt Lacey
      1 hour ago











    • Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago














    3












    3








    3







    You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).






    share|improve this answer













    You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    sfdcfoxsfdcfox

    257k12201444




    257k12201444













    • Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago











    • @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

      – sfdcfox
      1 hour ago











    • I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

      – Matt Lacey
      1 hour ago











    • Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago



















    • Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago











    • @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

      – sfdcfox
      1 hour ago











    • I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

      – Matt Lacey
      1 hour ago











    • Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

      – Kenji776
      1 hour ago

















    Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago





    Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago













    @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago





    @Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.

    – sfdcfox
    1 hour ago













    I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago





    I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.

    – Matt Lacey
    1 hour ago













    Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago





    Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.

    – Kenji776
    1 hour ago













    0














    I was actually able to find a fix for this. I uninstalled the Salesforce Connected Apps package which removed the reference to it in all my code. I was then able to upload a new version of the package which did not have the dependency and hence no error! Thanks @sfdcfox for pointing me the right direction!






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      I was actually able to find a fix for this. I uninstalled the Salesforce Connected Apps package which removed the reference to it in all my code. I was then able to upload a new version of the package which did not have the dependency and hence no error! Thanks @sfdcfox for pointing me the right direction!






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        I was actually able to find a fix for this. I uninstalled the Salesforce Connected Apps package which removed the reference to it in all my code. I was then able to upload a new version of the package which did not have the dependency and hence no error! Thanks @sfdcfox for pointing me the right direction!






        share|improve this answer













        I was actually able to find a fix for this. I uninstalled the Salesforce Connected Apps package which removed the reference to it in all my code. I was then able to upload a new version of the package which did not have the dependency and hence no error! Thanks @sfdcfox for pointing me the right direction!







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 29 mins ago









        Kenji776Kenji776

        285412




        285412






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Benedict Cumberbatch Contingut Inicis Debut professional Premis Filmografia bàsica Premis i...

            Monticle de plataforma Contingut Est de Nord Amèrica Interpretacions Altres cultures Vegeu...

            Escacs Janus Enllaços externs Menú de navegacióEscacs JanusJanusschachBrainKing.comChessV