Finding lengths when circles and squares tangents.How can we prove the locus is a circle?Do the tangents of...
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
The use of the spellings -zz- vs. -z-
Nested word series [humans only]
Why is Agricola named as such?
Traveling through the asteriod belt?
SET NOCOUNT Error in handling SQL call after upgrade
Am I a Rude Number?
speculum - A simple, straightforward Arch Linux mirror list optimizer
Is a new Boolean field better than a null reference when a value can be meaningfully absent?
How do you funnel food off a cutting board?
How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL
Can a long polymer chain interact with itself via van der Waals forces?
In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory?
How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled
Concatenation of fieldvalue and fieldname (handling of NULL)
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
Porting Linux to another platform requirements
What are the exceptions to Natural Selection?
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
When can a QA tester start his job?
Why did Luke use his left hand to shoot?
What is the difference between rolling more dice versus fewer dice?
kill -0 <PID> は何をするのでしょうか?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Finding lengths when circles and squares tangents.
How can we prove the locus is a circle?Do the tangents of two circles define concentric circles?Circles and tangentsCircles and tangents and circumcirclesPlane-geometry problem with circles and tangentsFinding the euclidean centers of the geodesics AB, AC, and BCConceptual question about coordinate systems?Find all tangents between circlesTwo Touching Ellipses - Tangents, Centres and CollinearitySine of angle between direct common tangents of two circles?
$begingroup$
Should one approach by coordinates or by euclidean geometry?
By pure geometry, I am not able to solve.
geometry circle tangent-line
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Should one approach by coordinates or by euclidean geometry?
By pure geometry, I am not able to solve.
geometry circle tangent-line
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Should one approach by coordinates or by euclidean geometry?
By pure geometry, I am not able to solve.
geometry circle tangent-line
$endgroup$
Should one approach by coordinates or by euclidean geometry?
By pure geometry, I am not able to solve.
geometry circle tangent-line
geometry circle tangent-line
edited 5 hours ago
Anirban Niloy
573118
573118
asked 5 hours ago
mavericmaveric
79412
79412
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume the larger radius is 1 first (the square's side is 2). Then the smaller radius $r=FB$ satisfies
$$sqrt{(1+r)^2-1}+r=2$$
from which we solve and obtain $r=frac23$.
Setting up coordinates such that $A$ is the origin, we find $G=(3/2,1/2),GB=sqrt2/2$ and $x=frac{2sqrt2}3$. Since $GB=3$ in the picture, scaling yields the desired $x$ of
$$frac{3cdot2sqrt2/3}{sqrt2/2}=4$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we see in the above diagram, $ABCD$ is a square and two semi circles with its center $E$ and $F$ respectively. Let place the point $Q$ in such that $triangle QEF$ is a right angled triangle and draw two altitude lines $MH$ and $GL$ from two vertices $H$ and $G$ respectively.
Again, denote the side of the sqaure = $x$ and the radius of small semi circle = $r'$. So, the radius of larger semi circle = $r = frac{x}{2}$.
From $triangle QEF$, we get
$EQ^2 + QF^2 = EF^2$
$(x-r')^2 + (frac{x}{2})^2 = (frac{x}{2} + r')^2$
$x^2 -2xr' +r'^2 + frac{x^2}{4} = frac{x^2}{4} + xr' + r'^2 implies x^2 = 3xr' implies x = 3r'$
Hence, $r' = frac{x}{3} implies r' = frac{2r}{3}$
$BD$ is the diagonal of the square $ABCD$ and $angle CBD = angle LBG = 45^circ$. So, here we get that $triangle GLB$ is an isosceles triangle.
Now, by the pythagorian theorem from $triangle GLB$,
$GL^2 + LB^2 = GB^2 implies GL^2 + GL^2 = 3^2 implies 2GL^2 = 9 implies GL = frac{3}{sqrt2}$
Next, $triangle CFB sim triangle CGL$ and from both tne triangle it can be written that
$frac{BC}{BF} = frac{x}{y} = frac{3y}{y} = 3$
and similarly,
$frac{CL}{GL} = 3 implies CL = 3 × frac{3}{sqrt2} implies CL = frac{9}{sqrt2}$
From that, $CB = CL + LB = CL + GL = frac{9}{sqrt2} + frac{3}{sqrt2} = frac{12}{sqrt2} = 6sqrt2$. So, the side of the square $ABCD$ = $x$ = $6sqrt2$
After that,$triangle CDE sim triangle HME$ and triangle BAD sim triangle HMD$. From the similarity of first two triangles, we get
$frac{CD}{HM} = frac{DE}{ME}$
Likewise from the next similarity,
$frac{AB}{HM} = frac{AD}{MD} implies frac{CD}{HM} = frac{CD}{MD}$.
So, we can write that
$frac{DE}{ME} = frac{CD}{MD}$
$frac{r}{a} = frac{2r}{r-a}$......(By denoting $ME = a$)
$2ra = r^2-ra implies 6sqrt2x = (3sqrt2)^2 -3sqrt2x implies 6sqrt2x = 18 - 3sqrt2x = 9sqrt2x = 18 implies x = frac{18}{9sqrt2} implies x = sqrt2$
Then, $DM= 3sqrt2 - a = 3sqrt2 - sqrt2 = 2sqrt2$
Notice that, $triangle DMH$ is an isosceles triangle and so,
$DH^2 = 2DM^2 = 2(2sqrt2)^2 = 2×8 = 16$
And finally, we get $DH = sqrt16 = 4$.
It could have been solved by any easier effort. But I made it very difficult. I hope that you will understand or if you have any problem, please let me know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129843%2ffinding-lengths-when-circles-and-squares-tangents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assume the larger radius is 1 first (the square's side is 2). Then the smaller radius $r=FB$ satisfies
$$sqrt{(1+r)^2-1}+r=2$$
from which we solve and obtain $r=frac23$.
Setting up coordinates such that $A$ is the origin, we find $G=(3/2,1/2),GB=sqrt2/2$ and $x=frac{2sqrt2}3$. Since $GB=3$ in the picture, scaling yields the desired $x$ of
$$frac{3cdot2sqrt2/3}{sqrt2/2}=4$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the larger radius is 1 first (the square's side is 2). Then the smaller radius $r=FB$ satisfies
$$sqrt{(1+r)^2-1}+r=2$$
from which we solve and obtain $r=frac23$.
Setting up coordinates such that $A$ is the origin, we find $G=(3/2,1/2),GB=sqrt2/2$ and $x=frac{2sqrt2}3$. Since $GB=3$ in the picture, scaling yields the desired $x$ of
$$frac{3cdot2sqrt2/3}{sqrt2/2}=4$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume the larger radius is 1 first (the square's side is 2). Then the smaller radius $r=FB$ satisfies
$$sqrt{(1+r)^2-1}+r=2$$
from which we solve and obtain $r=frac23$.
Setting up coordinates such that $A$ is the origin, we find $G=(3/2,1/2),GB=sqrt2/2$ and $x=frac{2sqrt2}3$. Since $GB=3$ in the picture, scaling yields the desired $x$ of
$$frac{3cdot2sqrt2/3}{sqrt2/2}=4$$
$endgroup$
Assume the larger radius is 1 first (the square's side is 2). Then the smaller radius $r=FB$ satisfies
$$sqrt{(1+r)^2-1}+r=2$$
from which we solve and obtain $r=frac23$.
Setting up coordinates such that $A$ is the origin, we find $G=(3/2,1/2),GB=sqrt2/2$ and $x=frac{2sqrt2}3$. Since $GB=3$ in the picture, scaling yields the desired $x$ of
$$frac{3cdot2sqrt2/3}{sqrt2/2}=4$$
answered 5 hours ago
Parcly TaxelParcly Taxel
43k1372101
43k1372101
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
I solved it by another way, but got the same answer.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy Yes, of course. Post it. I don't want to post my solution because it still is very ugly. I used a trigonometry. I see some nice fact, but I still don't see how to use it.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg Thank you for your opinion. Same case of mine. I used a lot of trigonometry but at last reached to conclusion. But my solution is too broad and I think it won't be acceptable in some extent.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Anirban Niloy We can prove that $measuredangle ECF=45^{circ}$ and $HG^2=DH^2+BG^2,$ but I don't see how to use it for a simple solution.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
32 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelRozenberg You're looking for a simple solution but still now I 'm trying to prove $HG^2 = DH^2 + BG^2$. 😅😅😅Pursue your effort and you'll get something simple solution soon than I.
$endgroup$
– Anirban Niloy
1 min ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we see in the above diagram, $ABCD$ is a square and two semi circles with its center $E$ and $F$ respectively. Let place the point $Q$ in such that $triangle QEF$ is a right angled triangle and draw two altitude lines $MH$ and $GL$ from two vertices $H$ and $G$ respectively.
Again, denote the side of the sqaure = $x$ and the radius of small semi circle = $r'$. So, the radius of larger semi circle = $r = frac{x}{2}$.
From $triangle QEF$, we get
$EQ^2 + QF^2 = EF^2$
$(x-r')^2 + (frac{x}{2})^2 = (frac{x}{2} + r')^2$
$x^2 -2xr' +r'^2 + frac{x^2}{4} = frac{x^2}{4} + xr' + r'^2 implies x^2 = 3xr' implies x = 3r'$
Hence, $r' = frac{x}{3} implies r' = frac{2r}{3}$
$BD$ is the diagonal of the square $ABCD$ and $angle CBD = angle LBG = 45^circ$. So, here we get that $triangle GLB$ is an isosceles triangle.
Now, by the pythagorian theorem from $triangle GLB$,
$GL^2 + LB^2 = GB^2 implies GL^2 + GL^2 = 3^2 implies 2GL^2 = 9 implies GL = frac{3}{sqrt2}$
Next, $triangle CFB sim triangle CGL$ and from both tne triangle it can be written that
$frac{BC}{BF} = frac{x}{y} = frac{3y}{y} = 3$
and similarly,
$frac{CL}{GL} = 3 implies CL = 3 × frac{3}{sqrt2} implies CL = frac{9}{sqrt2}$
From that, $CB = CL + LB = CL + GL = frac{9}{sqrt2} + frac{3}{sqrt2} = frac{12}{sqrt2} = 6sqrt2$. So, the side of the square $ABCD$ = $x$ = $6sqrt2$
After that,$triangle CDE sim triangle HME$ and triangle BAD sim triangle HMD$. From the similarity of first two triangles, we get
$frac{CD}{HM} = frac{DE}{ME}$
Likewise from the next similarity,
$frac{AB}{HM} = frac{AD}{MD} implies frac{CD}{HM} = frac{CD}{MD}$.
So, we can write that
$frac{DE}{ME} = frac{CD}{MD}$
$frac{r}{a} = frac{2r}{r-a}$......(By denoting $ME = a$)
$2ra = r^2-ra implies 6sqrt2x = (3sqrt2)^2 -3sqrt2x implies 6sqrt2x = 18 - 3sqrt2x = 9sqrt2x = 18 implies x = frac{18}{9sqrt2} implies x = sqrt2$
Then, $DM= 3sqrt2 - a = 3sqrt2 - sqrt2 = 2sqrt2$
Notice that, $triangle DMH$ is an isosceles triangle and so,
$DH^2 = 2DM^2 = 2(2sqrt2)^2 = 2×8 = 16$
And finally, we get $DH = sqrt16 = 4$.
It could have been solved by any easier effort. But I made it very difficult. I hope that you will understand or if you have any problem, please let me know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we see in the above diagram, $ABCD$ is a square and two semi circles with its center $E$ and $F$ respectively. Let place the point $Q$ in such that $triangle QEF$ is a right angled triangle and draw two altitude lines $MH$ and $GL$ from two vertices $H$ and $G$ respectively.
Again, denote the side of the sqaure = $x$ and the radius of small semi circle = $r'$. So, the radius of larger semi circle = $r = frac{x}{2}$.
From $triangle QEF$, we get
$EQ^2 + QF^2 = EF^2$
$(x-r')^2 + (frac{x}{2})^2 = (frac{x}{2} + r')^2$
$x^2 -2xr' +r'^2 + frac{x^2}{4} = frac{x^2}{4} + xr' + r'^2 implies x^2 = 3xr' implies x = 3r'$
Hence, $r' = frac{x}{3} implies r' = frac{2r}{3}$
$BD$ is the diagonal of the square $ABCD$ and $angle CBD = angle LBG = 45^circ$. So, here we get that $triangle GLB$ is an isosceles triangle.
Now, by the pythagorian theorem from $triangle GLB$,
$GL^2 + LB^2 = GB^2 implies GL^2 + GL^2 = 3^2 implies 2GL^2 = 9 implies GL = frac{3}{sqrt2}$
Next, $triangle CFB sim triangle CGL$ and from both tne triangle it can be written that
$frac{BC}{BF} = frac{x}{y} = frac{3y}{y} = 3$
and similarly,
$frac{CL}{GL} = 3 implies CL = 3 × frac{3}{sqrt2} implies CL = frac{9}{sqrt2}$
From that, $CB = CL + LB = CL + GL = frac{9}{sqrt2} + frac{3}{sqrt2} = frac{12}{sqrt2} = 6sqrt2$. So, the side of the square $ABCD$ = $x$ = $6sqrt2$
After that,$triangle CDE sim triangle HME$ and triangle BAD sim triangle HMD$. From the similarity of first two triangles, we get
$frac{CD}{HM} = frac{DE}{ME}$
Likewise from the next similarity,
$frac{AB}{HM} = frac{AD}{MD} implies frac{CD}{HM} = frac{CD}{MD}$.
So, we can write that
$frac{DE}{ME} = frac{CD}{MD}$
$frac{r}{a} = frac{2r}{r-a}$......(By denoting $ME = a$)
$2ra = r^2-ra implies 6sqrt2x = (3sqrt2)^2 -3sqrt2x implies 6sqrt2x = 18 - 3sqrt2x = 9sqrt2x = 18 implies x = frac{18}{9sqrt2} implies x = sqrt2$
Then, $DM= 3sqrt2 - a = 3sqrt2 - sqrt2 = 2sqrt2$
Notice that, $triangle DMH$ is an isosceles triangle and so,
$DH^2 = 2DM^2 = 2(2sqrt2)^2 = 2×8 = 16$
And finally, we get $DH = sqrt16 = 4$.
It could have been solved by any easier effort. But I made it very difficult. I hope that you will understand or if you have any problem, please let me know.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As we see in the above diagram, $ABCD$ is a square and two semi circles with its center $E$ and $F$ respectively. Let place the point $Q$ in such that $triangle QEF$ is a right angled triangle and draw two altitude lines $MH$ and $GL$ from two vertices $H$ and $G$ respectively.
Again, denote the side of the sqaure = $x$ and the radius of small semi circle = $r'$. So, the radius of larger semi circle = $r = frac{x}{2}$.
From $triangle QEF$, we get
$EQ^2 + QF^2 = EF^2$
$(x-r')^2 + (frac{x}{2})^2 = (frac{x}{2} + r')^2$
$x^2 -2xr' +r'^2 + frac{x^2}{4} = frac{x^2}{4} + xr' + r'^2 implies x^2 = 3xr' implies x = 3r'$
Hence, $r' = frac{x}{3} implies r' = frac{2r}{3}$
$BD$ is the diagonal of the square $ABCD$ and $angle CBD = angle LBG = 45^circ$. So, here we get that $triangle GLB$ is an isosceles triangle.
Now, by the pythagorian theorem from $triangle GLB$,
$GL^2 + LB^2 = GB^2 implies GL^2 + GL^2 = 3^2 implies 2GL^2 = 9 implies GL = frac{3}{sqrt2}$
Next, $triangle CFB sim triangle CGL$ and from both tne triangle it can be written that
$frac{BC}{BF} = frac{x}{y} = frac{3y}{y} = 3$
and similarly,
$frac{CL}{GL} = 3 implies CL = 3 × frac{3}{sqrt2} implies CL = frac{9}{sqrt2}$
From that, $CB = CL + LB = CL + GL = frac{9}{sqrt2} + frac{3}{sqrt2} = frac{12}{sqrt2} = 6sqrt2$. So, the side of the square $ABCD$ = $x$ = $6sqrt2$
After that,$triangle CDE sim triangle HME$ and triangle BAD sim triangle HMD$. From the similarity of first two triangles, we get
$frac{CD}{HM} = frac{DE}{ME}$
Likewise from the next similarity,
$frac{AB}{HM} = frac{AD}{MD} implies frac{CD}{HM} = frac{CD}{MD}$.
So, we can write that
$frac{DE}{ME} = frac{CD}{MD}$
$frac{r}{a} = frac{2r}{r-a}$......(By denoting $ME = a$)
$2ra = r^2-ra implies 6sqrt2x = (3sqrt2)^2 -3sqrt2x implies 6sqrt2x = 18 - 3sqrt2x = 9sqrt2x = 18 implies x = frac{18}{9sqrt2} implies x = sqrt2$
Then, $DM= 3sqrt2 - a = 3sqrt2 - sqrt2 = 2sqrt2$
Notice that, $triangle DMH$ is an isosceles triangle and so,
$DH^2 = 2DM^2 = 2(2sqrt2)^2 = 2×8 = 16$
And finally, we get $DH = sqrt16 = 4$.
It could have been solved by any easier effort. But I made it very difficult. I hope that you will understand or if you have any problem, please let me know.
$endgroup$
As we see in the above diagram, $ABCD$ is a square and two semi circles with its center $E$ and $F$ respectively. Let place the point $Q$ in such that $triangle QEF$ is a right angled triangle and draw two altitude lines $MH$ and $GL$ from two vertices $H$ and $G$ respectively.
Again, denote the side of the sqaure = $x$ and the radius of small semi circle = $r'$. So, the radius of larger semi circle = $r = frac{x}{2}$.
From $triangle QEF$, we get
$EQ^2 + QF^2 = EF^2$
$(x-r')^2 + (frac{x}{2})^2 = (frac{x}{2} + r')^2$
$x^2 -2xr' +r'^2 + frac{x^2}{4} = frac{x^2}{4} + xr' + r'^2 implies x^2 = 3xr' implies x = 3r'$
Hence, $r' = frac{x}{3} implies r' = frac{2r}{3}$
$BD$ is the diagonal of the square $ABCD$ and $angle CBD = angle LBG = 45^circ$. So, here we get that $triangle GLB$ is an isosceles triangle.
Now, by the pythagorian theorem from $triangle GLB$,
$GL^2 + LB^2 = GB^2 implies GL^2 + GL^2 = 3^2 implies 2GL^2 = 9 implies GL = frac{3}{sqrt2}$
Next, $triangle CFB sim triangle CGL$ and from both tne triangle it can be written that
$frac{BC}{BF} = frac{x}{y} = frac{3y}{y} = 3$
and similarly,
$frac{CL}{GL} = 3 implies CL = 3 × frac{3}{sqrt2} implies CL = frac{9}{sqrt2}$
From that, $CB = CL + LB = CL + GL = frac{9}{sqrt2} + frac{3}{sqrt2} = frac{12}{sqrt2} = 6sqrt2$. So, the side of the square $ABCD$ = $x$ = $6sqrt2$
After that,$triangle CDE sim triangle HME$ and triangle BAD sim triangle HMD$. From the similarity of first two triangles, we get
$frac{CD}{HM} = frac{DE}{ME}$
Likewise from the next similarity,
$frac{AB}{HM} = frac{AD}{MD} implies frac{CD}{HM} = frac{CD}{MD}$.
So, we can write that
$frac{DE}{ME} = frac{CD}{MD}$
$frac{r}{a} = frac{2r}{r-a}$......(By denoting $ME = a$)
$2ra = r^2-ra implies 6sqrt2x = (3sqrt2)^2 -3sqrt2x implies 6sqrt2x = 18 - 3sqrt2x = 9sqrt2x = 18 implies x = frac{18}{9sqrt2} implies x = sqrt2$
Then, $DM= 3sqrt2 - a = 3sqrt2 - sqrt2 = 2sqrt2$
Notice that, $triangle DMH$ is an isosceles triangle and so,
$DH^2 = 2DM^2 = 2(2sqrt2)^2 = 2×8 = 16$
And finally, we get $DH = sqrt16 = 4$.
It could have been solved by any easier effort. But I made it very difficult. I hope that you will understand or if you have any problem, please let me know.
answered 2 hours ago
Anirban NiloyAnirban Niloy
573118
573118
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3129843%2ffinding-lengths-when-circles-and-squares-tangents%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You can find the ratio between the radius of the large semicircle and the radius of the small circle by applying the Pythagorean theorem to triangle $AEF$. After that, similar triangles will finish the job.
$endgroup$
– FredH
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
at corner $B$ construct a square with diagonal $BG=3$. Use similar triangles to show the side of this square $= a/2$ where $AB=2a$. This shows $a=3sqrt{2}$. Similarly at corner $D$ to get the value of $x=2aleft.sqrt{2}right/3$
$endgroup$
– Lozenges
3 hours ago