A minimum of two personnel “are” or “is”?“A total of 10 babies is…” vs. “a total of 10 babies...
What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?
Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking
Why do members of Congress in committee hearings ask witnesses the same question multiple times?
Magento 2 : Call Helper Without Using __construct in Own Module
How do you funnel food off a cutting board?
Is it a fallacy if someone claims they need an explanation for every word of your argument to the point where they don't understand common terms?
How would a Dictatorship make a country more successful?
How do I say "Brexit" in Latin?
What makes the Forgotten Realms "forgotten"?
Adding a new switch to a C9300 stack
What is this metal M-shaped device for?
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
Why did this image turn out darker?
Quenching swords in dragon blood; why?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Jumping Numbers
Why is "points exist" not an axiom in geometry?
What kind of hardware implements Fourier transform?
How to prevent users from executing commands through browser URL
Solubility of a tribasic weak acid
Why does a metal block make a shrill sound but not a wooden block upon hammering?
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
What is the in-universe cost of a TIE fighter?
Solving Fredholm Equation of the second kind
A minimum of two personnel “are” or “is”?
“A total of 10 babies is…” vs. “a total of 10 babies are…” vs. “Ten babies in total are…”Does “staff” take a plural verb?Pluralizing “personnel”?What is the meaning of “personnel”? What is its plural form?“How much is/are the two fares?”Neither is or are“Two are better than one” or “Two is better than one”?“Here is my two cents” vs “Here are my two cents”?“Page 6 of those two documents is/are significantly different.”Singular or plural verb with “a minimum of”“Kids is mean” or “kids are mean”?
Which is correct?
A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.
or
A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.
grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
add a comment |
Which is correct?
A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.
or
A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.
grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
add a comment |
Which is correct?
A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.
or
A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.
grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
Which is correct?
A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective.
or
A minimum of two personnel is required to meet this objective.
grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals
grammatical-number verb-agreement irregular-plurals
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
edited 49 mins ago
sumelic
49.2k8116221
49.2k8116221
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
asked 2 hours ago
BrettABrettA
265
265
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.
1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....
It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.
- A minimum of two personnel is required...
“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).
Think of other ways of saying this.
what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.
The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.
Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-
At least two people are required ....
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
add a comment |
"A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.
For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487833%2fa-minimum-of-two-personnel-are-or-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.
1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....
It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.
- A minimum of two personnel is required...
“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).
Think of other ways of saying this.
what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.
The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.
Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-
At least two people are required ....
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
add a comment |
Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.
1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....
It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.
- A minimum of two personnel is required...
“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).
Think of other ways of saying this.
what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.
The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.
Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-
At least two people are required ....
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
add a comment |
Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.
1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....
It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.
- A minimum of two personnel is required...
“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).
Think of other ways of saying this.
what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.
The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.
Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-
At least two people are required ....
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
Your question relates to a common ‘singular versus plural’ dilemma, where there is a reasonable case for each.
1 A minimum of two personnel are required to ....
It is tempting to say that the plural “two personnel” is embedded in the singular “a minimum” and so the copula should be plural.
- A minimum of two personnel is required...
“A minimum” (singular) is the grammatical subject of the copula and so the copula should be singular (is).
Think of other ways of saying this.
what is required ... is a minimum of two personnel.
The standard answer to such dilemmas is to say it depends whether the writer is thinking of the singular unit or the plural members of it. But the decision to plump for one or the other is ultimately arbitrary. To some one feels wrong, to others the other does. So I have chosen to say it doesn’t matter.
Except either of the alternatives will bother somebody. So a principle (which I admit has no support in grammatical law) of ‘being considerate to the audience’ should apply: rephrase it entirely. And one is ready to hand (and briefer too):-
At least two people are required ....
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
answered 2 hours ago
TuffyTuffy
3,8691620
3,8691620
add a comment |
add a comment |
"A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.
For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
add a comment |
"A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.
For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
add a comment |
"A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.
For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
"A minimum of two personnel are required to meet this objective" is correct, even though the word "minimum" may be read as singular.
For an explanation regarding a similar question, please read @Jimi Oke's excellent answer here.
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
answered 2 hours ago
Mark HubbardMark Hubbard
6,17021131
6,17021131
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487833%2fa-minimum-of-two-personnel-are-or-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
