Why don't American passenger airlines still operate dedicated cargo flights?Why do some airlines operate...
Why are the books in the Game of Thrones citadel library shelved spine inwards?
Book where aliens are selecting humans for food consumption
Caruana vs Carlsen game 10 (WCC) why not 18...Nxb6?
Why did the villain in the first Men in Black movie care about Earth's Cockroaches?
What is this metal M-shaped device for?
Can an insurance company drop you after receiving a bill and refusing to pay?
Which password policy is more secure: one password of length 9 vs. two passwords each of length 8?
How to deal with an incendiary email that was recalled
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Can making a creature unable to attack, after it has been assigned as an attacker, remove it from combat?
Citing paywalled articles accessed via illegal web sharing
Blindfold battle as a gladiatorial spectacle - what are the tactics and communication methods?
Why isn't there a non-conducting core wire for high-frequency coil applications
How to avoid being sexist when trying to employ someone to function in a very sexist environment?
Why Normality assumption in linear regression
Lick explanation
How to prevent cleaner from hanging my lock screen in Ubuntu 16.04
Indirectly access environment variable
Program that converts a number to a letter of the alphabet
How should I handle players who ignore the session zero agreement?
Why do stocks necessarily drop during a recession?
My cat mixes up the floors in my building. How can I help him?
Parsing a string of key-value pairs as a dictionary
What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?
Why don't American passenger airlines still operate dedicated cargo flights?
Why do some airlines operate fleets so diversified?Did Pacific Southwest Airlines ever operate flights under VFR?Are cargo and passenger flights flown differently?Do Cargo flights carry anyone other than the crew?Why might American Airlines fly a 767 from JFK to EWR?Why do we see many more 5th and 8th freedom cargo flights than passenger flights?Why don't we have helicopter airlines?Do ETOPS requirements vary between passenger, cargo, and non-revenue flights?Which items are allowed on passenger flights but not on cargo ones?Why do cargo aircraft still have floors?
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
$endgroup$
I was reading recently that Northwest Airlines was the last American passenger carrier to operate dedicated Cargo aircraft. Why do none of the large US airlines operate dedicated cargo flights anymore? This seems to be common among international Airlines (Lufthansa, China Airlines, Qatar Airways, EVA, etc).
Presumably UPS and Fedex's extensive networks have something to do with it? I'm surprised that none of them find it economical, however.
airline-operations cargo
airline-operations cargo
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
edited 10 mins ago
Machavity
2,2872632
2,2872632
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
asked 19 hours ago
zymhanzymhan
3269
3269
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines still have dedicated freighters.
American, Delta, Southwest and United all have thriving cargo shipping operations, but as far as I can tell, no longer have freighters.
- https://www.aacargo.com
- https://www.alaskaair.com/content/cargo/general
- https://www.deltacargo.com
- https://www.hawaiianaircargo.com
- https://www.swacargo.com
Alaska used to run 737 Combi to ship to ship cargo and passengers in the main cabin on their “Milk Run” up the Alaskan panhandle. They now have dedicated freighters to handle the cargo.
- https://thepointsguy.com/2017/10/final-flight-alaska-airlines-737-400-combi/
Good luck shipping your parcel.
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60624%2fwhy-dont-american-passenger-airlines-still-operate-dedicated-cargo-flights%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
$endgroup$
A lot of airlines (USA flagged or not) still ship cargo in the hold along with passengers baggage, for some airlines its a high dollar business. Carriers like UPS, FedEx, etc, have surely put a dent in the plane-full-o-cargo market but for the airlines it actually helps to mitigate risk. If you carry both cargo and passengers you can be assured of a more stable revenue stream across the board. An airline can mitigate a lull in travel or cargo movement by also generating income from the other stream.
There is also a lot of differing logistics in moving cargo that a passenger airline may not want to deal with. UPS and FedEx also maintain truck fleets to deal with the package once it gets to an airport. This end to end business model is attractive to consumers. An airline, who may have the space on the plane but not the trucks, can't offer such service and for a given customer this may make or break the deal.
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
answered 18 hours ago
DaveDave
65.8k4124238
65.8k4124238
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
That makes sense, I noticed that Delta still lets you arrange cargo shipments on their scheduled passenger flights. It makes sense to have both in the same plane so you can make money from two different sources.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
You'd also need warehouses/processing facilities for large-scale cargo operations, in order to get things on the right plane (and packed efficiently), then transferred to trucks, and have every package tracked through the process.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
18 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the US? Because "trucks", +1, in a country with a federally maintained interstate highway system.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
13 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines still have dedicated freighters.
American, Delta, Southwest and United all have thriving cargo shipping operations, but as far as I can tell, no longer have freighters.
- https://www.aacargo.com
- https://www.alaskaair.com/content/cargo/general
- https://www.deltacargo.com
- https://www.hawaiianaircargo.com
- https://www.swacargo.com
Alaska used to run 737 Combi to ship to ship cargo and passengers in the main cabin on their “Milk Run” up the Alaskan panhandle. They now have dedicated freighters to handle the cargo.
- https://thepointsguy.com/2017/10/final-flight-alaska-airlines-737-400-combi/
Good luck shipping your parcel.
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines still have dedicated freighters.
American, Delta, Southwest and United all have thriving cargo shipping operations, but as far as I can tell, no longer have freighters.
- https://www.aacargo.com
- https://www.alaskaair.com/content/cargo/general
- https://www.deltacargo.com
- https://www.hawaiianaircargo.com
- https://www.swacargo.com
Alaska used to run 737 Combi to ship to ship cargo and passengers in the main cabin on their “Milk Run” up the Alaskan panhandle. They now have dedicated freighters to handle the cargo.
- https://thepointsguy.com/2017/10/final-flight-alaska-airlines-737-400-combi/
Good luck shipping your parcel.
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines still have dedicated freighters.
American, Delta, Southwest and United all have thriving cargo shipping operations, but as far as I can tell, no longer have freighters.
- https://www.aacargo.com
- https://www.alaskaair.com/content/cargo/general
- https://www.deltacargo.com
- https://www.hawaiianaircargo.com
- https://www.swacargo.com
Alaska used to run 737 Combi to ship to ship cargo and passengers in the main cabin on their “Milk Run” up the Alaskan panhandle. They now have dedicated freighters to handle the cargo.
- https://thepointsguy.com/2017/10/final-flight-alaska-airlines-737-400-combi/
Good luck shipping your parcel.
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
$endgroup$
Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines still have dedicated freighters.
American, Delta, Southwest and United all have thriving cargo shipping operations, but as far as I can tell, no longer have freighters.
- https://www.aacargo.com
- https://www.alaskaair.com/content/cargo/general
- https://www.deltacargo.com
- https://www.hawaiianaircargo.com
- https://www.swacargo.com
Alaska used to run 737 Combi to ship to ship cargo and passengers in the main cabin on their “Milk Run” up the Alaskan panhandle. They now have dedicated freighters to handle the cargo.
- https://thepointsguy.com/2017/10/final-flight-alaska-airlines-737-400-combi/
Good luck shipping your parcel.
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
edited 11 hours ago
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
answered 15 hours ago
gwallygwally
1,169512
1,169512
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
The question is about cargo-only aircraft, not belly cargo operations. Alaska Airlines is a special case, they only service Alaskan routes with their 737F. Besides, the general public can't ship belly cargo post 9/11, you must be TSA-approved.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user71659 And the answer explicitly says that Alaskan has cargo-only aircraft. You can claim that they're a special case but the question claims that no US passenger airline operates cargo-only flights and this answer rebuts that claim.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@DavidRicherby The real answer to the question is the economics of cargo compared to the geography of North America (you have to have a network). Alaska is a special case. The fact that combi/narrowbody cargo in Alaska is profitable is inapplicable to the lower 48.
$endgroup$
– user71659
14 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user71659 So what? Alaska is still part of the USA. Alaskan is still an American carrier. None of what you're saying invalidates the answer in any way.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
14 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
@user71659 "the real answer" has been covered by others. This supplemental answer provides good information which is completely on-topic and on-point.
$endgroup$
– user33375
11 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
$endgroup$
The cargo operation (dedicated fleet) requires its own logistical and operational apparatus. Unless an airline's cargo subsidiary is large enough to get the required economy of scale, along with decent market conditions, it's not worth the trouble and expense.
According to this article, Lufthansa's cargo operation lost money in 2016 and they were complaining about subsidies to Gulf operators that allow them to undercut airlines like Lufthansa who have marginally profitable cargo divisions.
And there's the rub. A good chunk of cargo operations outside the North America are subsidized (certainly the ones operated by government owned or controlled airlines). In the absence of subsidies, and with a harder focus on making every dollar count, in North America it was found to be more efficient to specialize.
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
answered 18 hours ago
John KJohn K
19.8k12457
19.8k12457
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
That makes a lot of sense, a cargo operation would require a lot of additional infrastructure that's not helpful for the passenger side of the house.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
18 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
Razor...thin...margins.
$endgroup$
– J...
16 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60624%2fwhy-dont-american-passenger-airlines-still-operate-dedicated-cargo-flights%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
